About Religion

Question:

>Keywords: international, space, science, ufo, human interest

x Ok ok, let’s clean up that newsgroup line. In particular, please consider the content of your followups and edit the Followup-To line appropriately. For example: I wish only to discuss physics (in sci.physics), and do not wish to find inane conversations from alt. groups. I can well believe the alt. followers don’t want to hear me insult them either. — 54 CambridgePark Drive, Cambridge,MA 02140 617-864-0201 **Just say NO to HMOs**

Response:

>>  I don’t see why Tom Bearden, whoever he is, overlooked another >hypothesis — that the brain is actually 14-dimensional, although it >Uh, that’s 15-dimensional.  You forgot Charm.  :-)

    Oh God.  Now someone is going to want a bunch of money to look for     strangeness, truth and beauty …                                     dale bass — Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of Virginia Charlottesville, Virginia                            (804) 924-7926

Response:

[Please forgive me for not cross-posting to the original alt. groups, we don't get them here.] Arrrgh. This guy is *worse* than Velikovsky, because he makes fewer concrete claims that will be utterly disproved in the foreseeable future. I’d love to see his math: if it supports his claims, great, but his word pictures as presented here have too many ambiguities and poor logic. "Heaviside examined quaternions later in life, so they must be the right way to view Maxwell’s equations." Gack! > Question:   Is there  any real  proof of the internal energy > channel operation  of the  mind, or  is it  just all still a > theory or hypothesis? > The basis  can be  shown, and  it  is  directly  subject  to > laboratory test,  with a  decent  laboratory  and  a  little > effort.  Let me give you a very strong datum point.

[description of hydrocephaly as proof that the mind exists separate from the brain, or the brain only exists as an interface to the Whittaker structure] As I remember from CT and MRI studies on these individuals (from various science articles and tv specials), these people have a remarkably high activity level in their remaining tissue. The implication is that, like any system with most of the hardware removed, the remaining tissue is operating at a much higher load to provide its function. It’s not a surprise that a system as adaptable and redundant as the brain can function with less mass and/or compressed tissues. Moreover, there are any number of organs in the body that can function with most of their tissue removed: liver, lungs, kidneys, pancreas.  What is so surprising about the brain doing it? Is someone surviving with one kidney proof that their soul is separate from their body, too? G-a-a-a-a-h. > Over  two   decades  ago,  a  Russian  scientist,  Lisitsyn, > obliquely spoke  of  Russian  breakthroughs  in  this  area. > Lisitsyn stated that the Soviets had "broken the human brain > code."   He  further  stated  that  some  23  channels  were > involved, reaching  all the  way up  to optical frequencies. > However,  only   11  of   these  frequency   channels   were > independent.   He also  mentioned that  the brain coding did > not number over 44 "digits".

And Lysenko got progeny that reproduced the extra limbs he sewed onto their parents: we haven’t seen any concrete results from *that* research, either. I’m sorry, but this entire interview smells of quackery. The concepts are subtle enough to withstand a cursory examination and there are few obviously bogus statements. They even sound sensible, in that they make no egregious mathematical or physical errors. But there is no *proof* and no *data*, only massaging and re-interpretation of other people’s unrelated work. Remember when Venus turned out to be hotter than expected, and folks hailed it as proof of Velikovsky’s cosmology? Certainly, not all of Mr. Bearden’s interview was within my understanding (quaternions?  B-r-r-r-r!). But every part of it that was, broke down under examination.  Perhaps the only silliness not present was the quack battle cry, "Galileo was persecuted, too!" > directly engineerable  on the lab bench.  It’s testable, and > when applied to quantum mechanics, it predicts hordes of new > phenomena and  effects, so  it certainly  gets  by  the  old > "Occam’s razor" saw.  When you apply Whittaker’s approach to > directly show that.  They also show how to engineer all this > on the  laboratory  bench.    So  the  Whittaker  scalar  EM > approach is  testable, which  meets the  major criterion for > the difference  between a  hypothesis and  a  theory.    Any

Then do it, clearly and unequivocally, not as a #$ thought experiment. Better yet, name two effects and describe precisely how to measure them unequivocally, do it, publish your paper, and get your Nobel prize. Yes, people have the right to express themselves on the net, in whatever groups they consider vaguely appropriate. Nevertheless, this particular subject strikes me as fodder for alt.religion.ufo and /dev/null, not as appropriate for salsmanning to sci.electronics or sci.physics. —                         Nico Garcia                         CIRL/MEEI

Response:

>>Question:   Is there  any real  proof of the internal energy >channel operation  of the  mind, or  is it  just all still a >theory or hypothesis?

How about some more bunk?  Bunk is always more fun than fax are. >There  exists   a  rare,   completely   bafflingly   medical

Rare, yes.  Completely baffling?  Hardly.  There are several recognized causes and several distinct forms. >phenomenon __  which has  until recently  been concealed  __

Concealed? Only by the cranium.  Hydrocephalus has been discussed "in the literature" (or at least "in the literature that I find on my desk–and I’m in the integrated-circuit biz not a licensed neurologist") for decades, which is about as long as anyone’s had the paradigm to research it. [...] >Now obviously  hydrancephaly proves rather conclusively that >it isn’t  really the  brain matter or the electrical wiggles >in the  two hemispheres  that constitute  the mind.    Those >The other day I asked Jerome Lettvin what he thought about those cases >– actually, it’s called hydrocephalus — in which a person seems to >have very little cerebral cortex, yet is not hopelessly retarded.  His

Moreover, I seem to recall something where the fetal form of hydrocephalus is correlated with _above average_ intelligence; even genius intelligence, in a number of cases.  (I think there was a Nova on this…) >theory: >  1. these are cases in which the fluid pressure in the brain is very >high.  (Like Glaucoma — usually because the secretion is normal but >the drainage mechanism is disabled.) >   2.  Like many other non-fatty tissues, the brain is mostly water. >   3.  Most of the water gets squeezed out.

This one (3) isn’t usually the case in fetuses.  See 6. >   4.  But most of the cells may continue to work, despite the >great enlargement of the ventricles (the inner fluid chambers). >   5.  (My addition) Also notice that the interior (white matter) as >well as the cortex gets pushed further to the periphery.  Then in >addition to the "dried fruit" compression effect, there is also the >square-cubed law.  The X-rays and CAT scans show only a thin layer of >brain next to the skull.  But consider that the volume of the >outermost 1/5 of the radius is about equal to the entire volume of the >inner 4/5ths, radially! (Because 125 – 64 = 61.)  SO the X-ray image >would appear to show far less tissue than is actually there, at least >to most adults who have no conception of how much volume is near the >surface of a 3-D object.

6.  When hydrocephalus happens to a fetus, the cranium is also enlarged (because it is not fused bone it is free to expand).  Thus the volume of the remaining cellular regions is decreased less than when hydrocephalus happens to an adult.  Also, the pressure of the cerebro-spinal fluid in the fetus doesn’t increase to damaging levels, again because the cranium is not of constant volume.  Thus there is not as much loss or damage of neural or vascular tissue as one would expect from a cursory pass at the idea that only half the brain chamber is filled with brain.  One of hydrocephalus’ visible characteristics is an enlarged cranium. >  I don’t see why Tom Bearden, whoever he is, overlooked another >hypothesis — that the brain is actually 14-dimensional, although it

Uh, that’s 15-dimensional.  You forgot Charm.  :-)                                 –Blair                                   "Or maybe it was ‘14-sided…’" Bibliography: _Principles of Neural Science_, edited by Eric R. Kandel and James H. Schwartz.  It’s published by Elsevier, and is probably in a different edition by now (I have the 2d.).

Response:

>I may be mistaking this for another condition but as I recall >a couple of months ago a girl with hydrancephaly was born in Florida. >Her parents wanted her disassembled into "spare parts" for transplants

Yes, you are mistaken: that unfortunate creature had ANancephaly, or essentially no brain at all (actually, no head above the level of her eyes). Whatever weirdness accounts for the normalcy of some hydracephalics does not apply to anancephalics, who never have any detectable human conciousness.

Response:

>Keywords: international, space, science, ufo, human interest >    BEIJING (UPI) — Chinese scientists are huddling this week to explore >the latest mysteries of unidentified flying objects, from reports of >sightings and abductions to claims that Chinese mystics are in contact >with life on other planets.

Excellent article… Keep on sending those. Have you explored, and are you considering the contacts to ETI made by Lamas in Tibetan lamazeries, too ? Yves

Response:

>I may be mistaking this for another condition but as I recall >a couple of months ago a girl with hydrancephaly was born in Florida.

Her condition was microencephaly.  There was much debate about the relative degrees of that condition.  A more severe condition called anencephaly also occurs.  It is not possible to mistake victims of these conditions for “normal” infants.  That is why the news video of the Florida chile always had her head covered to below the eyes. >I don’t know what the post-facto court decision is (will be?).

There will not be one, unless one is required as part of some other case.  Courts do not rule on moot points.  It can be argued that this is a defect in our legal system. — Steve Nuchia      South Coast Computing Services, Inc.      (713) 661-3301

Response:

Keywords: international, space, science, ufo, human interest         BEIJING (UPI) — Chinese scientists are huddling this week to explore the latest mysteries of unidentified flying objects, from reports of sightings and abductions to claims that Chinese mystics are in contact with life on other planets.         The nearly 200 researchers from around the country are meeting in Beijing at a conference sponsored by the China UFO Research Society, the national organization that coordinates studies in China of “fei die,” which in Chinese means “flying saucer.”         The society, known by its English acronym CURO, is engaged in research that spans the gamut from cold science to the weird and wacky, including efforts to speak to outer space without all the high-tech gadgetry employed by Western researchers.         “One of our important missions is to establish a way for people on Earth to communicate with other planets without resorting to modern communications methods,” said Wang Changting, the research society’s affable director.         Nearly 5,000 UFO-type sightings have been reported in China since the late 1970s, with all but around 200 later discounted as natural or man- made objects such as weather phenonema and aircraft.         The unsolved cases include sightings of floating basketballs, orange- lit washbasins and flying straw hats. Around 40 of those are the “close encounters” variety, with reports of contact or kidnappings by vaguely described extraterrestrials.         In one case, a teacher in eastern Tianjin reported seeing a shimmering ball overhead as he bicycled around a park at night. He lost consciousness and awoke the next morning at the park gate to find the time on his watch an hour behind the actual time.         A month later, he suddenly recalled having been abducted onto a strange craft by two short beings in unidentifiable space suits.         Along with those reports, and research into related topics like atmospheric phenomena, some of the 3,500 CURO members nationwide are studying claims by Chinese mystics that they can locate UFOs or communicate with aliens.         Some claim to use “qigong,” a practice that marshals the Chinese concept of life energy, to make contact. Although qigong is an accepted exercise discipline, adherents also make fantastic claims of supernatural powers or faith healing ability.         “Sometimes we cannot mix Western reality and Oriental belief,” shrugged Wang. “Of course there are some illogical things involved, but the line between science and mysticism cannot be separated only as illogic.”         Among other areas of research are theoretical and practical studies of space flight, the possibility of life on other planets and the potential impact of UFOs on the Earth’s environment.         UFO research is taken seriously in China. Several years ago, a UFO sighting over an open air film show in rural south China sparked a stampede by panicked villagers that left two people dead and 300 injured.         The Chinese military, which sometimes scrambles air force jets to try to catch a glimpse of UFOs, conducts its own UFO studies and maintains contact with CURO researchers, Wang said.         But not even scientists are immune to the more outlandish aspects of UFOs, he added, noting a report by a CURO researcher who claimed he had been “invited” aboard a space craft and taken to a planet thousands of light years away.         “This man was a scientist, so we don’t believe that what he told us is altogether nonsense,” Wang said. “But we can’t explain it.”

Response:

|> >There  exists   a  rare,   completely   bafflingly   medical |> >phenomenon __  which has  until recently  been concealed  __ |> >called hydrancephaly.   To  the normal materialistic Western |> >biologist, this  condition is astonishing, to say the least. |> >In hydrancephaly, a person’s cranial cavity is filled almost |> >totally with  fluid, not  with brain  matter.   There may be |> >only 5%  or so  of the  brain in  there; typically  just the |> >small portion on the tip of the spine.  The other 95% of the |> >brain case  is filled with fluid.  Yet the individual may be |> >as normal  as you  or I. |> |> I may be mistaking this for another condition but as I recall |> a couple of months ago a girl with hydrancephaly was born in Florida. |> Her parents wanted her disassembled into "spare parts" for transplants |> before her body died.  They had to go through the courts to get the |> pernmission and the courts stalled long enough for the girl to die. |> I don’t know what the post-facto court decision is (will be?). |> |> At the time of the story being big in the nationwide media, the incidents |> hydrancephaly were discussed and there was no indication of either a |> past "concealment" of it or of a hydrancephalic infant being able to |> survive very long after being born.   |> |> — |> "… i heard the droning / in the shrine |>        of the sea-monkey / palace of the brine …" — Pixies. |> VERITAS Software                           …!{apple|uunet}!veritas!oleg Warning: I am not a doctor, and I don’t even play one on TV. You are discussing 2 different medical conditions. I understand the basics of both, but can’t remember what they are called. One is where a baby is born without the majority of it’s brain. The babies cannot survive. The other is where a baby is born normally, but a "valve" in the brain that drains off spinal fluid is clogged. The fluid builds up in "cavities" in the brain squeezing the brain tissue until it takes up as little as 5% of the volume of the "brain box" (I said I wasn’t a doctor didn’t I These children used to die eventually, but a shunt was developed to drain the fluid. Survivors from the 60’s (or 70’s?) who have now had MRI (NMR?) imaging show that they have a small percentage of the brain matter (by volume?) normally found, but their intelligence has not been affected. I saw a British TV show that documented the second phenomenon, I believe that it was called something like "Is your Brain Really Necessary?". I got the impression that although the brains of these people had been compressed to a small percentage of their normal volume, they still maintained the compexity necessary to function. Another advantage was that the problem showed up in very young, growing children who’s brains had the capability of adapting and "rewiring" (which an adult would not be capable of.) I think the term is "plasticity". Sorry if I made any serious blunders. Leonard. — | Leonard E. Spani      |       //!?         | (disclaimer-p)       |

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Question:   Is there  any real  proof of the internal energy >channel operation  of the  mind, or  is it  just all still a >theory or hypothesis? >The basis  can be  shown, and  it  is  directly  subject  to >laboratory test,  with a  decent  laboratory  and  a  little >effort.  Let me give you a very strong datum point. >There  exists   a  rare,   completely   bafflingly   medical >phenomenon __  which has  until recently  been concealed  __ >called hydrancephaly.   To  the normal materialistic Western >biologist, this  condition is astonishing, to say the least. >In hydrancephaly, a person’s cranial cavity is filled almost >totally with  fluid, not  with brain  matter.   There may be >only 5%  or so  of the  brain in  there; typically  just the >small portion on the tip of the spine.  The other 95% of the >brain case  is filled with fluid.  Yet the individual may be >as normal  as you  or I.   Except, of course, that x-rays of >his head  will astonish  all the  doctors.  A few years ago, >for example, such a hydrancephalic individual graduated from >a university in Great Britain, with a degree in mathematics. >British news  actually made  a  video  documentary  on  this >subject, and particularly on that individual. >Now obviously  hydrancephaly proves rather conclusively that >it isn’t  really the  brain matter or the electrical wiggles >in the  two hemispheres  that constitute  the mind.    Those

  [Etc.]> The other day I asked Jerome Lettvin what he thought about those cases — actually, it’s called hydrocephalus — in which a person seems to have very little cerebral cortex, yet is not hopelessly retarded.  His theory:   1. these are cases in which the fluid pressure in the brain is very high.  (Like Glaucoma — usually because the secretion is normal but the drainage mechanism is disabled.)    2.  Like many other non-fatty tissues, the brain is mostly water.    3.  Most of the water gets squeezed out.    4.  But most of the cells may continue to work, despite the great enlargement of the ventricles (the inner fluid chambers).    5.  (My addition) Also notice that the interior (white matter) as well as the cortex gets pushed further to the periphery.  Then in addition to the "dried fruit" compression effect, there is also the square-cubed law.  The X-rays and CAT scans show only a thin layer of brain next to the skull.  But consider that the volume of the outermost 1/5 of the radius is about equal to the entire volume of the inner 4/5ths, radially! (Because 125 – 64 = 61.)  SO the X-ray image would appear to show far less tissue than is actually there, at least to most adults who have no conception of how much volume is near the surface of a 3-D object.   I don’t see why Tom Bearden, whoever he is, overlooked another hypothesis — that the brain is actually 14-dimensional, although it can only perceive three of those dimensions, the other 11 being presumably occupied with other matters that he could surely explain. Then, if you squeeze it to half its linear dimension, well, I can’t figure it out right now, but a factor of 2,048 would be available to explain lots of other amazing phenomena (-;

Response:

>There  exists   a  rare,   completely   bafflingly   medical >phenomenon __  which has  until recently  been concealed  __ >called hydrancephaly.   To  the normal materialistic Western >biologist, this  condition is astonishing, to say the least. >In hydrancephaly, a person’s cranial cavity is filled almost >totally with  fluid, not  with brain  matter.   There may be >only 5%  or so  of the  brain in  there; typically  just the >small portion on the tip of the spine.  The other 95% of the >brain case  is filled with fluid.  Yet the individual may be >as normal  as you  or I.

I may be mistaking this for another condition but as I recall a couple of months ago a girl with hydrancephaly was born in Florida. Her parents wanted her disassembled into "spare parts" for transplants before her body died.  They had to go through the courts to get the pernmission and the courts stalled long enough for the girl to die. I don’t know what the post-facto court decision is (will be?). At the time of the story being big in the nationwide media, the incidents hydrancephaly were discussed and there was no indication of either a past "concealment" of it or of a hydrancephalic infant being able to survive very long after being born.   — "… i heard the droning / in the shrine              of the sea-monkey / palace of the brine …" — Pixies. VERITAS Software                           …!{apple|uunet}!veritas!oleg

Response:

Question:   Is there  any real  proof of the internal energy channel operation  of the  mind, or  is it  just all still a theory or hypothesis? The basis  can be  shown, and  it  is  directly  subject  to laboratory test,  with a  decent  laboratory  and  a  little effort.  Let me give you a very strong datum point. There  exists   a  rare,   completely   bafflingly   medical phenomenon __  which has  until recently  been concealed  __ called hydrancephaly.   To  the normal materialistic Western biologist, this  condition is astonishing, to say the least. In hydrancephaly, a person’s cranial cavity is filled almost totally with  fluid, not  with brain  matter.   There may be only 5%  or so  of the  brain in  there; typically  just the small portion on the tip of the spine.  The other 95% of the brain case  is filled with fluid.  Yet the individual may be as normal  as you  or I.   Except, of course, that x-rays of his head  will astonish  all the  doctors.  A few years ago, for example, such a hydrancephalic individual graduated from a university in Great Britain, with a degree in mathematics. British news  actually made  a  video  documentary  on  this subject, and particularly on that individual. Now obviously  hydrancephaly proves rather conclusively that it isn’t  really the  brain matter or the electrical wiggles in the  two hemispheres  that constitute  the mind.    Those wiggles normally  are correlated  with, and communicate back and forth  with, the internal Whittaker dynamics of the bio- potential.   The  brain  is  a  special  communications  and processing station,  interfacing sensors and processed stuff from the  external world  to the Whittaker-sets, and outputs from the  Whittaker-sets to  the body  and cells.  If just a small functioning  part of  this "way station" remains fully functional, the interfacing still exists. Question:   Can you shed any light on the functioning of the fluid  that   fills  95%   of  the   brain   cavity   of   a hydrancephalic? Perhaps a  little bit.   There’s  an interesting thing about fluid __  about water.   The  hydrogen bonding  structure of water is  enormously complex  and  richly  varying.    Bond- structuring of  water constitutes  a special  kind of  "neo- Whittaker" substructure  inside a  special kind of potential for that  particular body  of water.   A glass of water, for example, has  an  overall  neo-potential  comprised  of  its hydrogen bond  structuring.   That  water  will  change  its internal bonding  structure if you enter the room, or if you blink your  eye while  observing it.  It continually adjusts to  everything   in  its   surroundings.    The  reason  is, everything in  its environment  has charges,  and clumps  or orderings or  structures of  potential.   And  the  internal Whittaker structures of all those potentials overlap because the   potentials    overlap.      Therefore   the   internal bidirectional Whittaker EM waves intercommute.  The internal dynamics of  the water receives inputs from the surroundings this  way,   and  the   water’s  bonding  structure  changes accordingly.   We’ve only  known the complexity and richness of this  water structuring for less than two decades, and so far as  I know,  no one  else seems  to be  considering  the Whittaker infolded EM wave structure aspects of it. The point  is this:   In  the fluid  inside the  head  of  a functional hydrancephalic,  the water  structuring is  quite sufficient to  provide the  rest of  the needed "way-station two-way tuner,  processor, and  transmitter-receiver."   The reason  is  quite  simple:    The  potential  of  the  fluid constitutes a partial potential in the overall bio-potential of the  body.  It’s like the pressure of a mixture of gases: the overall  pressure consists  of the  partial pressures of the  component  gases.    The  Whittaker  structures  ensure intermingling and  intercommunication through  the  internal energy channels  of  the  total  bio-potential  to  all  its constituents.   Therefore the water structuring of the fluid in the head of the hydrancephalic serves __ bridgewise __ as a substitute brain. Other  supporting  evidence,  of  course,  is  that  quantum mechanics experiments  have essentially  established action- at-a-distance  and   quantum  correlation.     The   quantum potential, therefore, is something real and functional after all. And even  more evidence  is provided  by  the  nature  of  a linear  material   versus  the   nature  of  a  nonlinear material.   However, that would take a book, and is just too much to  cover in  this interview.  Suffice it to say that a strong   argument   can   be   made   from   the   nonlinear characteristics and phenomena themselves, such as production of  time-reversed   waves,  amplification  of  time-reversed waves, negentropy (re-ordering of scattering energy), etc. The bottom line is that there’s certainly enough evidence to substantially support  these hypotheses,  and move them from the realm  of idle  speculation to  the realm of "worthy for further experimentation  and  development."    The  ultimate proof, of  course, will  be when one demonstrates the actual production, recording,  and functioning  of a  living  mind. With the  internal energy  approach, that  is hypothetically quite possible, and will eventually be lab-demonstrated. Question:  How is this related to the neurons, synapses, and dendrite firings in the normal human brain? The same  "internal electrical  structure" thing  is true of the brain  and its  dendrite firings, EM waves, and tiny but extremely  numerous   currents  and   fields.      Take   an instantaneous  snapshot  of  all  the  dendrite  firings  __ billions of  them __  frozen for  an instant.    The  actual pattern or  structure represents  the internal  state of the brain’s  bio-potential   at  that  instant.    Take  another snapshot a  moment  later.    The  change  of  the  internal structuring represents   the brain’s internal structuring at a new  moment.   Interfering (subtracting) the two snapshots provides a  delta that represents the exact and total change that occurred  in the  brain-state during that tiny interval between snapshot  one and  snapshot two.   But since thought itself is a change in internal brain-state, then the thought patterns during  that interval  must be  contained in  those changes.   And of  course a  myriad of  other brain  control actions are  in there  as well.  Commands to beat the heart, direct biochemistry  of cells,  etc.  To detect the internal state precisely,  one now  needs  to  decompose  that  delta pattern into  its Whittaker-structure  components  and  sort them all out. Question:   How would  one go  about detecting  the internal state, to get at the actual thoughts themselves? Well, one  has rather  much got  involved with  the standard chaos problem.   You’ve  got  hidden  order  (the  thoughts) buried up  in a lot of extraneous material.  In other words, you’re  looking  at  something  statistical,  and  it’s  got several kinds of hidden order hidden in there in what to you appears to  be a  whole lot  of noise.   So you do something very similar  to what  we described in the snapshot analogy, but apply  Whittaker-channel detection  at  the  same  time. Actually,  a   first  step   in  this   direction  has  been beautifully done  by Dr.  Hunt.   She divided  the  external brain-wave region  into several frequency bands.  (Actually, harmonic intervals are best, per Whittaker theory.)  She set up individual  detectors  for  all  the  frequency  channels simultaneously.   Then she divided each of these channels in two branches:  one branch  straight through  without a  time delay, and  the other  delayed by a bit, say, 6 milliseconds or so.   Then  she mixed all the delay channels onto all the nondelay channels,  and recorded  the superposition.  And lo and behold,  she got  beautiful traces  of hidden  chaos  in brain wave  activity.   The traces  exhibited  the  standard chaos attractors.   Her  magnificent  work  is  very  strong evidence that the real activity of the mind occurs in hidden variables,   in    hidden   channels   inside   the   normal "envelope/external electromagnetics"  represented by  normal brain wave  measurements.   Hunt has  shown that  there is a hidden, deterministic,  dynamic order  "inside"  the  normal statistical EM brain activity. Over  two   decades  ago,  a  Russian  scientist,  Lisitsyn, obliquely spoke  of  Russian  breakthroughs  in  this  area. Lisitsyn stated that the Soviets had "broken the human brain code."   He  further  stated  that  some  23  channels  were involved, reaching  all the  way up  to optical frequencies. However,  only   11  of   these  frequency   channels   were independent.   He also  mentioned that  the brain coding did not number over 44 "digits". Now  I   interpret  his  remarks  as  indicative  of  direct application of Whittaker theory.  Lisitsyn of course did not give the  details; that’s  highly classified  in the  Soviet Union, as  witnessed by the Petukov/Toth incident in Moscow. However, I  interpret Lisitsyn  as having obliquely referred to 11  independent Whittaker  frequencies __ the fundamental frequency and  10 harmonics  __ that  are used  by the brain workstation to  intercommunicate between  the mind  and  the external electrical/physical functioning of the organism.  I interpret the  remark about  44 digits to probably mean that there are  some 44  different independent Whittaker spectrum sets, where each spectrum consists of the fundamental and 10 harmonics.   And in  each frequency  channel of a set, there are two  bidirectional EM  waves __ actually, an EM wave and its time-reversed antiwave (phase conjugate replica). Question:  Can you tell us something more about detection of standing scalar EM potential waves? For fundamental … read more »

Response: