About Religion

Question:

[The first part of this post is directed at the people named, and those aiding and abetting them in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for everyone.] This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t about Steve, it’s about *you*. I find it rather odd that the people slinging the most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe you should go look in the mirror and ask who is looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about this. Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. The way you have been acting makes the most immature, undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own that each of you has at least one friend who does something you would find personally disgusting, if only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it sad and pathetic. So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority of us are capable of self-respect and self-control enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to harass someone.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->[The first part of this post is directed at the >people named, and those aiding and abetting them >in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism >or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for >everyone.] >This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving >Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out >that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details >of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really >don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t >about Steve, it’s about *you*. >I find it rather odd that the people slinging the >most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I >can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be >awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering >about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a >perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones >obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe >you should go look in the mirror and ask who is >looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about >this. >Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being >a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. >By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. >The way you have been acting makes the most immature, >undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At >least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. >If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own >that each of you has at least one friend who does >something you would find personally disgusting, if >only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still >have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis >with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. >Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both >"conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at >hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it >sad and pathetic. >So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to >avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation >to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn >the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks >the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. >I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or >name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority >of us are capable of self-respect and self-control >enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to >harass someone.

Was that your lesson of the day Meils? It would have been simpler to just point out that the people who’re the best at recognizing perverts, are other perverts. Takes less words that way. Pete — Next year? Who knows when that’ll be? –Bloo

Response:

> [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*.

Oh, I’m bleeding. Look, I’d mention it less, except for the fact that he was so gleeful about it, he couldn’t even stop short of slagging people who DON’T lick assholes. "Prudes", he said. It’s all fine for you to drivel and snivel about having respect for others, but people who don’t give any, don’t get any, I say. If he’s so hot to have everyone know he puts his tongue up peoples’ asses, then why cry to ME about it? Oh, I forgot: It’s about ME, isn’t it? Freep – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

Response:

Hey shit for brains, you’ve been claiming to have me killfiled for some time now.  Why are you reading my posts? How about instead of whining you follow the advice of your lord and master, ‘no likee no clickee’? BTW, if by chance you consider yourself a christian *any* form of oral sex would be considered sodomy, a mortal sin.  If you’ve *ever* had any form of sex with anyone who isn’t your lawfully wedded spouse you’ve committed the mortal sin of adultery. Now tell us all you’ve never done either of those acts of ‘perversion’, we need a good laugh! cheers…. HJA

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*. > I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

Nice try, man.  But, a pig’s gonna roll where he wants to – you’ll just get dirty trying to fish him out.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*. > I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it.

That’s enough. Speaking for myself, Miles, you are indeed lucky you are not a betting man, for you would lose that bet. There are few men I call friend, but those I do I know as well or better than most men know their brothers. The unspeakable impudence with which you would call the least of them "pervs" would certainly get you beaten to death were we to meet. Call those YOU know pervs, if you want to. You clearly don’t know any friends of MINE, and it is your great good fortune that you don’t know me, either. Do yourself a favor and try to keep it that way. As to my posts: if you don’t like them, don’t read them. But if you are ever in front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also snap your neck. Lars – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> That’s enough. > Speaking for myself, Miles, you are indeed lucky you are not a betting > man, for you would lose that bet. There are few men I call friend, but > those I do I know as well or better than most men know their brothers. > The unspeakable impudence with which you would call the least of them > "pervs" would certainly get you beaten to death were we to meet. > Call those YOU know pervs, if you want to. You clearly don’t know any > friends of MINE, and it is your great good fortune that you don’t know > me, either. Do yourself a favor and try to keep it that way. As to my > posts: if you don’t like them, don’t read them. But if you are ever in > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > snap your neck. > Lars

A true Christian speaks, huh? Happy Easter to you too!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*. > I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > That’s enough. > Speaking for myself, Miles, you are indeed lucky you are not a betting > man, for you would lose that bet. There are few men I call friend, but > those I do I know as well or better than most men know their brothers. > The unspeakable impudence with which you would call the least of them > "pervs" would certainly get you beaten to death were we to meet.

Well, like you said, you don’t talk to other guys about their sex life, so how would you know? I guess you just judge this by judging their character, right? LOL. Face it dude, you been squawking about Steve for weeks now. Who’s the perv? You’re a real toughie threatening someone over the net, there Larse. > Call those YOU know pervs, if you want to.

You do the same and everyone will be happy, Larse. Refrain from commenting on that which you obviously know nothing about and the world will be a lot friendlier towards you.  You clearly don’t know any > friends of MINE, and it is your great good fortune that you don’t know > me, either.

Thank jeebus for small favours.  Do yourself a favor and try to keep it that way. As to my > posts: if you don’t like them, don’t read them. But if you are ever in > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > snap your neck.

OOOooh, Larse is a tough guy! Real smart threatening someone you don’t know, rocket man! I guess you’re touchy about your best buddy, Clueless Creep. Come here and say that, little man! Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*. > Oh, I’m bleeding. Look, I’d mention it less, except for the fact that he was > so gleeful about it, he couldn’t even stop short of slagging people who > DON’T lick assholes. "Prudes", he said. It’s all fine for you to drivel and > snivel about having respect for others, but people who don’t give any, don’t > get any, I say. If he’s so hot to have everyone know he puts his tongue up > peoples’ asses, then why cry to ME about it?

The fact that you repeat it at every available opportunity indicates a rather unhealthy obsession with the aforementioned activity. As I once told you before (and is now being underscored by someone else) your posts are very telling about the kind of guy you are. It would seem that you are a pervert. Looks like it’s you and Michael Jackson, Freak. Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Oh, I forgot: It’s about ME, isn’t it? > Freep > I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up.  Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

Response:

Fearless Freep, tied to the tracks, said: … > Oh, I’m bleeding. Look, I’d mention it less, except for the fact that he was > so gleeful about it, he couldn’t even stop short of slagging people who > DON’T lick assholes. "Prudes", he said. It’s all fine for you to drivel and > snivel about having respect for others, but people who don’t give any, don’t > get any, I say. If he’s so hot to have everyone know he puts his tongue up > peoples’ asses, then why cry to ME about it?

Whatever he said, he said it one post, from what you’re telling me.  He didn’t go on and on and on, putting it in every possible post from then on. *That’s* the point.

Response:

howard_aubrey, tied to the tracks, said: > Hey shit for brains, you’ve been claiming to have me killfiled for some > time now.  Why are you reading my posts?

Havem’t claimed that in a while. But you’re probably going back in soon. > How about instead of whining you follow the advice of your lord and > master, ‘no likee no clickee’?

You really are clever, Howie.  In case you haven’t noticed, LV is just another guy on the net, far as I’m concerned.  Granted, one who knows his stuff and sells dynamite tubes. But hardly my lord and master.  Maybe *you* buy into that hype?  Not me. > BTW, if by chance you consider yourself a christian *any* form of oral > sex would be considered sodomy, a mortal sin.

First off, why would I think you have anything to say about Christianity?  You’ve got one of the nastiest attitudes and foulest mouths in AGA.  What does hte Bible say about how folk will know a Christian, hmmm? And where do you get these definitions you toss around above?  Lots of Christian churches, pastors,and theologians would disagree with you. > If you’ve *ever* had any > form of sex with anyone who isn’t your lawfully wedded spouse you’ve > committed the mortal sin of adultery.

Hey I’m not Catholic.  All sin comes between us and God.  If you repent, you are forgiven.  That’s what my Bible says. It doesn’t say anything about "mortal" vs "venial" sins. > Now tell us all you’ve never done either of those acts of ‘perversion’, > we need a good laugh!

I have freely admitted that I’m a sinner saved by grace.  Part of my testimony includes the fact that I did drugs, that I slept around, and various other things that would all keep me away from God.  But I repented, and Jesus forgave me.  Just like in the Bible.  That’s what it’s all about.  You can be forgiven, too. [And for the record, my testimony doesn't go into detail about my sex life.] -Miles

Response:

Lars Overshank, tied to the tracks, said: … > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > That’s enough.

That’s pretty funny, coming from you! > Speaking for myself, Miles, you are indeed lucky you are not a betting > man, for you would lose that bet. There are few men I call friend, but > those I do I know as well or better than most men know their brothers. > The unspeakable impudence with which you would call the least of them > "pervs" would certainly get you beaten to death were we to meet.

Nope, I didn’t call ‘em pervs.  But if they do anything like that, then *you* call them pervs.  By definition. If you have almost no friends, then I can believe you know them that well– maybe. And frankly, if you’d try to beat someone to death for calling someone a perv, that’s pretty pathetic.  And a life sentence (or worse) waiting to happen.  Assuming you succeed, of course.  8^) > Call those YOU know pervs, if you want to. You clearly don’t know any > friends of MINE, and it is your great good fortune that you don’t know > me, either. Do yourself a favor and try to keep it that way. As to my > posts: if you don’t like them, don’t read them.

Same back at you. > But if you are ever in > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > snap your neck.

Whatever. Have a nice life, Lars.

Response:

… > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever.

Ouch!  by association… > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone. > Nice try, man.  But, a pig’s gonna roll where he wants to – you’ll just get > dirty trying to fish him out.

I think that *just about* sums it up… indeed, nice try, and points to Miles for attempting to elevate the discourse. Believe me, there’s *no way* I’d have admitted to anything I was ashamed of here… so don’t worry about me.  My conscience is clean, even if my tongue is not!  (big smiley for all you prudes…) I admit, I used the opportunity to point out what jerks Flars are… they bit hook, line, sinker, rod, tacklebox, and beer cooler.  I should probably reconsider before doing that to someone again… carnal knowledge is not best used as a club. __ Steve .

Response:

> Fearless Freep, tied to the tracks, said: > … > Oh, I’m bleeding. Look, I’d mention it less, except for the fact that he > was > so gleeful about it, he couldn’t even stop short of slagging people who > DON’T lick assholes. "Prudes", he said. It’s all fine for you to drivel > and > snivel about having respect for others, but people who don’t give any, > don’t > get any, I say. If he’s so hot to have everyone know he puts his tongue > up > peoples’ asses, then why cry to ME about it? > Whatever he said, he said it one post,

Wrong again. He went on and on, post after post, about what he assumed I wouldn’t ALSO do, and how prudish he would think I was if  it were so. He moaned and whined ‘cunnilingus’ so many times, I started to think he was *asking* for some. And here, I had thought he was a guy. You really should research these things better if you’re going to go giving sermons all the time about what you think other people should and shouldn’t say to AGAers. Believe me, it is a lot better than just taking a wild guess at what you’d imagine I’m telling you.  How many times do you have to be wrong on a key point before maybe you figure out that you were just plain barking up the wrong tree, here? Remember when you thought that I had just decided to say Steve sucks asses all on my own, unprovoked? And then you thought he only said it once and I was overreacting. Maybe you should ask yourself WHY you made these assumptions. It might be an interesting thought experiment. But then, I guess if you were able to re-evaluate your position, you wouldn’t be a liberal, would you? So think what you want. I’m pretty much over being disappointed in you by now, although I still think it’s a shame, kinda. Maybe you just had too much on your mind lately, and cracked… whatever. As to Steve, he asked for it, and then he got all upset when he got it. I guess he expected I would recoil in shocked silence at the thought of him licking assholes. Like I’d never heard of such a thing before he came along… Didn’t know quite what to do when I didn’t, so he started whining, and getting people like you to draw some of the heat away from him. Typical liberal weenie puss-puss. No wonder you guys travel in packs. Maybe he needs another break to get himself back together. Oh, and for the record: Steve says he shoves his tongue up other peoples’ assholes. So does Canadian Bob, AKA Uncle Fucka. He wasn’t even IN on the conversation, but he just had to jump in to say "me too" when Steve told us about himself. If they can joke about the fact that I don’t, I can certainly joke about the fact that they DO. Especially since I have THEIR word on it. Later, Miles. Here: sit in the killfile for a while. Freep – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> from what > you’re telling me.  He didn’t go on and on and on, > putting it in every possible post from then on. > *That’s* the point.

Response:

… > Later, Miles. Here: sit in the killfile for a while. > Freep

Wow… I think you can see what you stumbled into by what’s missing here (400-some-odd words). I won’t bother to quote it again here… basically, Freep accused me of sucking ass, so I thought I’d turn the tables on him and admit to having done anilingus with a female.  This is what started the bonobo cage rocking. At this point most sensible folk skipped out… as you saw, Freep and Lars decided that there was hay to be made, to their own undoing.  At no point did I regret my admission… I’ve even tired of tarring them with Elvie’s convenient quote.  They’ve dug their grave so far deep that I’m actually considering regretting my admission… obviously it’s burned a spot in Freep’s brain, and I don’t normally go in for extreme damage like that, even for someone as vile as Freep’s been. And now I sound condescending… ’nuff said. Anyway, don’t worry about me.. I think I’ve got the situation well in hand.  Just don’t tell Howie that I’m overweight too, or I’ll die of shame! __ Steve .

Response:

<snip> – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> That’s enough. > Speaking for myself, Miles, you are indeed lucky you are not a betting > man, for you would lose that bet. There are few men I call friend, but > those I do I know as well or better than most men know their brothers. > The unspeakable impudence with which you would call the least of them > "pervs" would certainly get you beaten to death were we to meet. > Call those YOU know pervs, if you want to. You clearly don’t know any > friends of MINE, and it is your great good fortune that you don’t know > me, either. Do yourself a favor and try to keep it that way. As to my > posts: if you don’t like them, don’t read them. But if you are ever in > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > snap your neck. > Lars

<snip> What a heap-o-horseshit. Congratulations, you’ve now lost what little credibility an anonymous poster can have. Lets see who will stand with you on your threats. Any takers? John King

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > … > Later, Miles. Here: sit in the killfile for a while. > Freep > Wow… I think you can see what you stumbled into by > what’s missing here (400-some-odd words). > I won’t bother to quote it again here… basically, > Freep accused me of sucking ass, so I thought > I’d turn the tables on him and admit to having > done anilingus with a female.

*Figuratively* sucking ass. And it was CLEAR that it was figurative. Not exactly an unprecedented accusation here on AGA. You had wrote in to say yes-you’re-right, and nothing else, to someone, because they were a fellow liberal talking to a conservative. To most, that would be an important distinction. You are the first to respond to it by admitting that you LITERALLY suck assholes, though. So here you are STILL pointing out that you literally suck ass, and saying how proud you are of it. And yet, Miles still insists that you made the statement only once, and then presumably left it alone. He also claims *I* said so. Good for you that you enjoy it. I rather enjoy the howling that reminding others that you do that, produces. It is funny to me that you crow about doing it, REPEATEDLY, and certain others STILL gripe to ME for keeping it going. We’ve already unmasked King, and Miles, formerly thought to be reasonable people, as reflexive liberal-defenders on (let’s face it) ANY topic, no matter how unrelated, no matter how gross, and no matter how initiated by the liberal. That bias, heretofore well hidden, is a good thing to expose. It shows us who we’re dealing with, here. Freep Investigative reporter – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> This is what > started the bonobo cage rocking. > At this point most sensible folk skipped out… > as you saw, Freep and Lars decided that > there was hay to be made, to their own > undoing.  At no point did I regret my > admission… I’ve even tired of tarring them > with Elvie’s convenient quote.  They’ve > dug their grave so far deep that I’m actually > considering regretting my admission… obviously > it’s burned a spot in Freep’s brain, and I don’t > normally go in for extreme damage like that, > even for someone as vile as Freep’s been. > And now I sound condescending… ’nuff said. > Anyway, don’t worry about me.. I think I’ve > got the situation well in hand.  Just don’t tell > Howie that I’m overweight too, or I’ll die > of shame! > __ > Steve > .

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> … >> Later, Miles. Here: sit in the killfile for a while. >> Freep > Wow… I think you can see what you stumbled into by > what’s missing here (400-some-odd words). > I won’t bother to quote it again here… basically, > Freep accused me of sucking ass, so I thought > I’d turn the tables on him and admit to having > done anilingus with a female. > *Figuratively* sucking ass. And it was CLEAR that it was figurative. Not > exactly an unprecedented accusation here on AGA. You had wrote in to say > yes-you’re-right, and nothing else, to someone, because they were a fellow > liberal talking to a conservative. To most, that would be an important > distinction. You are the first to respond to it by admitting that you > LITERALLY suck assholes, though. So here you are STILL pointing out that you > literally suck ass, and saying how proud you are of it. And yet, Miles still > insists that you made the statement only once, and then presumably left it > alone. He also claims *I* said so.

Hey, man, I was there. he said it once, presumably to blow your little mind (I think it can be reasonably assumed that it did the trick-lol) and you have repeated it ad infinitum. > Good for you that you enjoy it. I rather enjoy the howling that reminding > others that you do that, produces. It is funny to me that you crow about > doing it, REPEATEDLY, and certain others STILL gripe to ME for keeping it > going. We’ve already unmasked King, and Miles, formerly thought to be > reasonable people, as reflexive liberal-defenders on (let’s face it) ANY > topic, no matter how unrelated, no matter how gross, and no matter how > initiated by the liberal. That bias, heretofore well hidden, is a good thing > to expose. It shows us who we’re dealing with, here.

I have heard/seen no howling, Freak. It’s all in your mind. The only person you have unmasked is yourself and you are getting feedback from others to your detriment. Why don’t you just keep crowing about it so that everyone can see what kind of asshole you really are? > Freep > Investigative reporter

You ain’t got the smarts, Freak Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> This is what > started the bonobo cage rocking. > At this point most sensible folk skipped out… > as you saw, Freep and Lars decided that > there was hay to be made, to their own > undoing.  At no point did I regret my > admission… I’ve even tired of tarring them > with Elvie’s convenient quote.  They’ve > dug their grave so far deep that I’m actually > considering regretting my admission… obviously > it’s burned a spot in Freep’s brain, and I don’t > normally go in for extreme damage like that, > even for someone as vile as Freep’s been. > And now I sound condescending… ’nuff said. > Anyway, don’t worry about me.. I think I’ve > got the situation well in hand.  Just don’t tell > Howie that I’m overweight too, or I’ll die > of shame! > __ > Steve > .

Response:

. But if you are ever in – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live long > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > snap your neck. > Lars > <snip> > What a heap-o-horseshit. > Congratulations, you’ve now lost what little credibility > an anonymous poster can have. Lets see who will stand > with you on your threats. Any takers? > John King

Have you noticed how the superheated responses tend to come from the trollers, not their ‘victims’? As far as the likes of Lars and the various inane Bobs, or the peculiarly foul HJA (as well as a certain underclass of Canadian smegmoids) actually matter, it is in how well they serve as examples of what to avoid on the net. Hyperventilating chest thumpers and self-aggrandizing twits. Boring too. Note to MIles: We keep telling ourselves not to feed the trolls – but from time to time it’s important to put a paragraph of sense on the record, just for purposes of differentiation. Nice post. Chuck www.monkeychild.com

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > . But if you are ever in > > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live > long > > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but also > > snap your neck. > > Lars > <snip> > What a heap-o-horseshit. > Congratulations, you’ve now lost what little credibility > an anonymous poster can have. Lets see who will stand > with you on your threats. Any takers? > John King > Have you noticed how the superheated responses tend to come from the > trollers, not their ‘victims’? > As far as the likes of Lars and the various inane Bobs, or the > peculiarly foul HJA (as well as a certain underclass of Canadian > smegmoids) actually matter, it is in how well they serve as examples of > what to avoid on the net. Hyperventilating chest thumpers and > self-aggrandizing twits. Boring too. > Note to MIles: We keep telling ourselves not to feed the trolls – but > from time to time it’s important to put a paragraph of sense on the > record, just for purposes of differentiation. Nice post. > Chuck > www.monkeychild.com

It seems to me that this is a tad ironic if you’re not going to include your best buddy Lord Valve in the above list. Calling me inane after posting the above twaddle is actually pretty funny. Bob

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> . But if you are ever in > > > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live > long > > > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but > also > > > snap your neck. > > > Lars > > <snip> > > What a heap-o-horseshit. > > Congratulations, you’ve now lost what little credibility > > an anonymous poster can have. Lets see who will stand > > with you on your threats. Any takers? > > John King > Have you noticed how the superheated responses tend to come from the > trollers, not their ‘victims’? > As far as the likes of Lars and the various inane Bobs, or the > peculiarly foul HJA (as well as a certain underclass of Canadian > smegmoids) actually matter, it is in how well they serve as examples > of > what to avoid on the net. Hyperventilating chest thumpers and > self-aggrandizing twits. Boring too. > Note to MIles: We keep telling ourselves not to feed the trolls – but > from time to time it’s important to put a paragraph of sense on the > record, just for purposes of differentiation. Nice post. > Chuck > www.monkeychild.com > It seems to me that this is a tad ironic if you’re not going to include > your best buddy Lord Valve in the above list. Calling me inane after > posting the above twaddle is actually pretty funny. > Bob

Your posts speak for themselves, as do mine. I’m comfortable with that. You shouldn’t be. Bye now. Chuck www.monkeychild.com

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> [The first part of this post is directed at the > people named, and those aiding and abetting them > in their pathetic, childish game of net.terrorism > or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for > everyone.] > This thread was prompted by the exchanges involving > Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point out > that I really don’t care to hear the sexual details > of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I really > don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This isn’t > about Steve, it’s about *you*. > I find it rather odd that the people slinging the > most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but I > can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to be > awfully focused on this one act they keep yammering > about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as a > perv because of this, but *you folk* are the ones > obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up. Maybe > you should go look in the mirror and ask who is > looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking about > this. > Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But being > a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. > By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third graders. > The way you have been acting makes the most immature, > undisciplined, screwed up third grader look good.  At > least s/he has an excuse– being only a third grader. > If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I own > that each of you has at least one friend who does > something you would find personally disgusting, if > only you knew.  (That is, those among you who still > have friends.)  So you consort on a regular basis > with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. > Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both > "conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at > hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it > sad and pathetic. > So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to > avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the temptation > to join the crowd with the torches screaming, "Burn > the monster!", regardless of who the crowd thinks > the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, whomever. > I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or > name-callling.  I do think that the vast majority > of us are capable of self-respect and self-control > enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just to > harass someone.

I for one use the word "pervert" to depict someone who purposely twists, misconstrues, spins or even misquotes someone else’s post in order to destroy their credibility or win some lame ass debate. However, I admit in indulging in some of the same, but it was only after it was done to me. And when one observes way too much of that perverse human activity of ass-kissing, brown-nosing and boot-licking, that same word "pervert" comes to mind when it comes to expressing the disgust of that pathetic activity. But I did not make up those depictions for that activity and only those with the dirty minds are the ones who whine about the images those deptictions make in their own minds.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > . But if you are ever in > > > > front of me talking carelessly about my friends, you won’t live > > long > > > > enough to take it back, for I will not only kick your ass, but > also > > > > snap your neck. > > > > Lars > > > <snip> > > > What a heap-o-horseshit. > > > Congratulations, you’ve now lost what little credibility > > > an anonymous poster can have. Lets see who will stand > > > with you on your threats. Any takers? > > > John King > > Have you noticed how the superheated responses tend to come from > the > > trollers, not their ‘victims’? > > As far as the likes of Lars and the various inane Bobs, or the > > peculiarly foul HJA (as well as a certain underclass of Canadian > > smegmoids) actually matter, it is in how well they serve as > examples > of > > what to avoid on the net. Hyperventilating chest thumpers and > > self-aggrandizing twits. Boring too. > > Note to MIles: We keep telling ourselves not to feed the trolls – > but > > from time to time it’s important to put a paragraph of sense on the > > record, just for purposes of differentiation. Nice post. > > Chuck > > www.monkeychild.com > It seems to me that this is a tad ironic if you’re not going to > include > your best buddy Lord Valve in the above list. Calling me inane after > posting the above twaddle is actually pretty funny. > Bob > Your posts speak for themselves, as do mine.

They sure do, Chuck. You’re an ass-kisser.  I’m comfortable with that. Really? I wouldn’t be. > You shouldn’t be.

If you had brains, you’d be dangerous.  Bye now. Buh-bye Bob

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->[The first part of this post is directed at the >people named, and those aiding and abetting them >in their pathetic, childish game of > net.terrorism >or net.bigotry or whatever.  The last bit is for >everyone.] >This thread was prompted by the exchanges > involving >Howard, Lars, Freep, and others.  I should point > out >that I really don’t care to hear the sexual > details >of anyone’s life, Steve’s or otherwise.  I > really >don’t care what he’s done, or with whom.  This > isn’t >about Steve, it’s about *you*. >I find it rather odd that the people slinging > the >most filth (that wasn’t a baboon reference, but > I >can see why some folk use the metaphor) seem to > be >awfully focused on this one act they keep > yammering >about.  You keep trying to paint someone else as > a >perv because of this, but *you folk* are the > ones >obsessed by it and constantly bringing it up. > Maybe >you should go look in the mirror and ask who is >looking out, and why they can’t quit thinking > about >this. >Or maybe it’s just that you’re bullies.  But > being >a bully on the net is about as lame as it gets. >By the way, I withdraw my comparison to third > graders. >The way you have been acting makes the most > immature, >undisciplined, screwed up third grader look > good.  At >least s/he has an excuse– being only a third > grader. >If I were a betting man, I’d bet everything I > own >that each of you has at least one friend who > does >something you would find personally disgusting, > if >only you knew.  (That is, those among you who > still >have friends.)  So you consort on a regular > basis >with "pervs", and are perfectly happy with it. >Perhaps it’s comforting to some to see that both >"conservatives" and "liberals" are so good at >hypocritical witch hunting.  I merely find it >sad and pathetic. >So, I am asking all of you who are reasonable to >avoid these threads.  Don’t give in to the > temptation >to join the crowd with the torches screaming, > "Burn >the monster!", regardless of who the crowd > thinks >the monster is – Lord Valve, Steve, Elvis, > whomever. >I don’t expect everyone to avoid irritation or >name-callling.  I do think that the vast > majority >of us are capable of self-respect and > self-control >enough to avoid jumping in with the bullies just > to >harass someone. > I for one use the word "pervert" to depict someone > who purposely twists, misconstrues, spins or even > misquotes someone else’s post in order to destroy > their credibility or win some lame ass debate.

Blumby creates a new deffinition for words… > However, I admit in indulging in some of the same, > but it was only after it was done to me.

Blum hereby admits that under "his" definition of the word, he in fact , considers himself to be a *pervert*. Good boy Ed..! ! ! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> And when one observes way too much of that > perverse > human activity of ass-kissing, brown-nosing and > boot-licking, that same word "pervert" comes to > mind > when it comes to expressing the disgust of that > pathetic > activity. But I did not make up those depictions > for that > activity and only those with the dirty minds are > the > ones who whine about the images those deptictions > make in their own minds.

Well, are you saying that this somehow explains some of your more disgusting posts…????  Eh… Ed..??? gtski

Response:

snip drivel This from a troll? After you called out and threatened Miles because you didn’t like something he said? It’s almost too lame for words. STOP drinking before noon Take ALL of your meds -ON TIME DON’T take lessons from other, more competent, trolls. Some of them are going to jail. In jail you WON’T have the internet: the only means at YOUR disposal to fool yourself into thinking ANYBODY gives a shit what you think. I don’t bother to plonk, but I’m done with you. On to a better class of sock. Chuck www.monkeychild.com

Response: