Skip to content

Archive

Category: Christian Books

Question:

1. USS Liberty (Shhhhhhhhh) 2. U.S. Days of Jewish/Christian Voting Bloc GONE 3. Shhhh- About those 9000 Syrian and Palestinian prisoners, many of     whom are women and children in Israeli PRISONS…. 4. See 1-3. Add: US Economy, starting w/ Housing sector. WATCH. 5. See-1-4. Add: Iraq Civil War Shiite on Sunni and v.v.

Response:

[ Attached Message ]

To: Local:

Silence of the AGA Lambs 1. USS Liberty (Shhhhhhhhh) 2. U.S. Days of Jewish/Christian Voting Bloc GONE 3. Shhhh- About those 9000 Syrian and Palestinian prisoners, many of     whom are women and children in Israeli PRISONS…. 4. See 1-3. Add: US Economy, starting w/ Housing sector. WATCH. 5. See-1-4. Add: Iraq Civil War Shiite on Sunni and v.v.

Response:

> 1. USS Liberty (Shhhhhhhhh) > 2. U.S. Days of Jewish/Christian Voting Bloc GONE > 3. Shhhh- About those 9000 Syrian and Palestinian prisoners, many of >     whom are women and children in Israeli PRISONS…. > 4. See 1-3. Add: US Economy, starting w/ Housing sector. WATCH. > 5. See-1-4. Add: Iraq Civil War Shiite on Sunni and v.v.

It’s ALL your’s Mulay..you win. Have a great time by yourself…

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> 1. USS Liberty (Shhhhhhhhh) > 2. U.S. Days of Jewish/Christian Voting Bloc GONE > 3. Shhhh- About those 9000 Syrian and Palestinian prisoners, many of >     whom are women and children in Israeli PRISONS…. > 4. See 1-3. Add: US Economy, starting w/ Housing sector. WATCH. > 5. See-1-4. Add: Iraq Civil War Shiite on Sunni and v.v. > It’s ALL your’s Mulay..you win. Have a great time by yourself…

There was never any doubt. The rest of you have been forced into a retreat marked by re-hashing stuff available on my bookshelf. Have a great time friend felching on line!

Response:

Question:

DeLay to Resign From Congress By Jonathan Weisman and Chris Cillizza (Washington Post)     Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), a primary architect of the Republican majority who became one of the most powerful and feared leaders in Washington, told House allies last night that he will give up his seat rather than face a reelection fight that appears increasingly unwinnable.     The decision came three days after Tony C. Rudy, his former deputy chief of staff, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and corruption charges, telling federal prosecutors of a criminal enterprise being run out of DeLay

Question:

Pray for the World 31 October 2005 Update From HCJB World Radio Today’s Headlines: UNIDENTIFIED ASSAILANTS BEHEAD 3 CHRISTIAN SCHOOLGIRLS IN INDONESIA BAPTIST MISSION RUSHES AID TO HURRICANE WILMA VICTIMS IN MEXICO PASTOR ELECTROCUTED DURING BAPTISMAL SERVICE IN TEXAS CHURCH COURT ASKS INDIA’S GOVERNMENT TO REVIEW RESTRICTIVE ADOPTION LAWS OPEN DOORS REFOCUSES ATTENTION ON NATIONS HIT BY TSUNAMI Today’s Top Stories: UNIDENTIFIED ASSAILANTS BEHEAD 3 CHRISTIAN SCHOOLGIRLS IN INDONESIA Unidentified machete-wielding assailants attacked a group of girls attending a private Christian high school in eastern Indonesia’s Central Sulawesi province Saturday, Oct. 29, beheading three of them and seriously wounding a fourth, police said. The students were ambushed while walking through a cocoa plantation on their way to class in the Poso Kota subdistrict. The rural area is close to the provincial capital of Poso about 900 miles northeast of Jakarta. Police spokesman Made Rai said that about 1,000 police, including reinforcements from other parts of the country, were securing the remote regency of Poso, reported Reuters. An additional 300 officers were expected to arrive on Sunday. The three headless bodies of the girls, dressed in brown uniforms, were left at the site of the attack. Their heads were found at separate locations by residents two hours later. "So far no witness has been questioned and no suspect arrested," said Raj. The attacks occurred despite a government-mediated truce signed in early 2002 that brought Muslims and Christians together after fighting on the Moluccan Islands left up to 9,000 people dead in three years. The government agreed to be responsible for law enforcement and security aspects of the agreement. But since then a series of bomb attacks and assassinations have targeted believers. Christian leaders have repeatedly criticized the authorities in Jakarta for not doing enough to find the perpetrators and bring them to justice. The Christian-Muslim conflict in Sulawesi is an extension of a wider sectarian war in the Moluccas. (Assist News Service/Christian Solidarity Worldwide) BAPTIST MISSION RUSHES AID TO HURRICANE WILMA VICTIMS IN MEXICO Hurricane Wilma’s 125 mph winds claimed eight lives and caused widespread damage to Mexico’s Yucatan Peninsula the weekend of Saturday, Oct. 22. "Our main concern at this point is just the health and safety of people . . . primarily just keeping folks alive," said Doug Millar, a missionary with the Southern Baptist’s International Mission Board (IMB). "IMB personnel in the area are safe. They and their local Baptist partners already have started basic relief in the form of water purifiers, rice and beans. Food staples have been purchased using Southern Baptist World Hunger and Relief funds. They also will provide clothing and housing supplies. We have had major destruction, not only in the poor areas, which normally in a flood would have tragedy, but even in the main hotels in the hotel zone. There was a 30-foot [wall of] water that went across the hotel zone into our bay that devastated the area." Millar added that Hurricane Wilma’s slow path across the peninsula intensified the damage. (Mission Network News) PASTOR ELECTROCUTED DURING BAPTISMAL SERVICE IN TEXAS CHURCH A Baptist pastor was electrocuted as he was about to perform a baptism at his church in Waco, Texas, the morning of Sunday, Oct. 30. Rev. Kyle Lake, 33, died at University Baptist Church in Waco when he grabbed a microphone while partially submerged in the baptismal. Dudley’s wife, Jamie, said doctors attending the service performed chest compressions on Lake until he was taken to a Waco hospital where he was declared dead. About 800 people attended the Sunday-morning service which was larger than normal because it was homecoming weekend at nearby Baylor University. The woman being baptized apparently had not stepped into the water and was not seriously injured. Lake was the church’s pastor for the last seven years and the author of two books published by Relevant Books: Understanding God’s Will and the new release, Understanding Prayer. Lake is survived by his wife and three young children. (Assist News Service/Associated Press) COURT ASKS INDIA’S GOVERNMENT TO REVIEW RESTRICTIVE ADOPTION LAWS India’s Supreme Court issued a notice to the federal government on Monday, Sept. 26, asking it to respond to the absence of laws enabling religious minorities to legally adopt children. Currently only Hindus can adopt a child. The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act of 2000 would allow Christians and other religious minorities in India to adopt, but confusion about state empowerment of adoption agencies has stalled implementation. Of approximately 12 million orphans in India, only 5,000 are adopted each year. (Compass) OPEN DOORS REFOCUSES ATTENTION ON NATIONS HIT BY TSUNAMI Each year Open Doors USA releases its World Watch List which ranks 50 nations where persecution of Christians is the worst. For the third year in a row, North Korea stands at No. 1 followed by Saudi Arabia and Vietnam. However, during the International Day of Prayer for the Persecuted Church Sunday, Nov. 13, Open Doors has chosen to turn its attention on the countries hardest hit by last December’s tsunami — Sri Lanka, India and Indonesia — which rank 29th, 34th and 37th respectively. The tsunami only added to the long-term suffering already being endured by the believers in these countries. In Sri Lanka the tsunami left almost 40,000 people dead and 2.5 million others displaced. Persecution of Christians there has increased in recent years. Statistics from the World Evangelical Alliance show that from January 2003 to March 2004, more than 140 anti-Christian incidents were recorded. These incidents ranged from mild threats to death warnings, arson and the destruction of church buildings. Buddhist monks in Sri Lanka are pushing for an amendment to the country’s constitution that would make Buddhism the state religion and enact anti-conversion laws. India also has seen an increase in the severity of persecution the last year with numerous attacks on Christians. Hindu leaders are seeking to enact a comprehensive law banning religious conversions in India as part of a new campaign to stem the "increasing" number of conversions from Hinduism to Christianity. Muslim leaders in Indonesia want to implement sharia (Islamic law) nationwide. Congresses held in Jakarta and Sulawesi in the last year recommended that sharia principles be introduced through a revision of Indonesia’s criminal law. Meanwhile, provincial councils are including more sharia principles in local bylaws. In some provinces governors have restricted freedom of worship for Christians. (Open Doors USA) *Peace of Christ* http://grace.break.at To send e-mail, remove "youhat" from address

Response:

Pray for the World: F18News Summary: Azerbaijan; Belarus; Turkmenistan; Uzbekistan; – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> FORUM 18 NEWS SERVICE, Oslo, Norway > http://www.forum18.org/ > The right to believe, to worship and witness > The right to change one’s belief or religion > The right to join together and express one’s belief > 25 October 2005 > AZERBAIJAN: FAMILY AND MOSQUE APPEAL FOR IMAM’S FREEDOM > http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=677 > The family and mosque community of the only Sunni Muslim mosque in > Azerbaijan’s second city Gyanja have appealed for their imam, Kazim Aliev, > to be freed – three and a half years after his arrest. His family have > told > Forum 18 News Service that they reject absolutely the government > accusation > that Aliev was preparing an armed anti-government uprising to create an > Islamic state. Aliev, who is married with three young children, is being > held in prison camp 15 in Baku and his lawyer, Eldar Zeynalov, head of the > Human Rights Centre of Azerbaijan, insists that he has been wrongfully > jailed. A European Court of Human Rights appeal is currently under way. > Zeynalov told Forum 18 that he believes Aliev’s refusal to demand set fees > for carrying out religious rituals angered other imams in the town, and > that this may have provoked the charges. Aliev was initially held by the > Military Counter-Intelligence Department for espionage, but the > allegations were later changed. > 25 October 2005 > BELARUS: THIRD MASSIVE FINE FOR ORGANISING RELIGIOUS WORSHIP > http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=676 > The administrator of the Minsk-based charismatic New Life Church, Vasily > Yurevich, has been fined a third time for leading unauthorised worship. > The latest fine is the massive amount of 3,825,000 Belarusian roubles > (11,645 Norwegian Kroner, 1,488 Euros or 1,780 US Dollars), which is well > over 10 times the average monthly wage in Belarus. The official text of > the local court decision, which has been seen by Forum 18, relies upon > police testimony – which Yurevich and congregation members strongly > dispute – identifying him as the organiser of a Sunday service "by his > outward appearance." New Life’s Pastor Vyacheslav Goncharenko – who has > also been fined for unsanctioned worship – insisted that the church would > continue to meet for worship. It has also been denied state permission to > turn a disused cowshed it purchased into a church building, on the grounds > that it is technically a cowshed. A number of other Protestant churches > have also reported recent moves by state officials to limit their > religious activity, on the basis of technical violations. > * See full article below. * > 24 October 2005 > TURKMENISTAN: MORE PRESSURE AGAINST ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS PRACTISE > http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=675 > Turkmenistan appears to be increasing pressure against Islam religious > practise, Forum 18 News Service has learnt. A human rights activist has > told Forum 18 of increased moves against practising male Muslims visiting > mosques in northern Turkmenistan, including two arrests. The MSS secret > police officers have made imams hang a list of mosque-goers above the > doors to their mosques, and now only those whose names are on the list are > allowed to visit that mosque. Turkmenistan’s deputy mufti, Atash Zamedov, > refused to answer Forum 18’s questions about lists of names hung over > mosque entrances. Also, after the reduction of student numbers and > dismissal of foreign Turkish lecturers at the Muslim theological faculty > in Ashgabad, Forum 18 has learnt that all local Turkmen teachers and > technical staff as well have been dismissed and replaced with new > appointees. > 27 October 2005 > UZBEKISTAN: "BELIEVERS ARE NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO VISIT EACH OTHER" > http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=678 > Members of the Full Gospel Church in Jizak, at an informal meal to > celebrate the harvest festival last Tuesday (25 October), had their meal > broken up the ordinary police, the National Security Service (NSS) secret > police and officials from the Public Prosecutor’s office, Forum 18 News > Service has learnt. "I think the actions of the law enforcement officers > in Jizak were a gross infringement of the law," Iskander Najafov, the > church’s lawyer, told Forum 18. "It turns out that believers are not even > allowed to visit each other." Najafov believes that an anti-Christian > campaign is underway, with less violence than in the past but using other > methods to pressure churches and individual believers. Religious > minorities face continuing official pressure, including the Subbotniki – a > Christian movement founded in the eighteenth century who follow many > Jewish > laws and customs, who were forbidden from holding a religious ritual for > one of the community’s members who had just died. > 25 October 2005 > BELARUS: THIRD MASSIVE FINE FOR ORGANISING RELIGIOUS WORSHIP > http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=676 > By Geraldine Fagan, Moscow Correspondent, Forum 18 News Service > The administrator of the Minsk-based charismatic New Life Church, Vasily > Yurevich, has been fined a third time the massive amount of 3,825,000 > Belarusian Roubles (11,270 Norwegian Kroner, 1,434 Euros or 1,727 US > Dollars) for leading unauthorised worship. The average wage in Belarus is > estimated to be between 100 and 150 US Dollars per month. The official > text of the 7 October local court decision, which has been seen by Forum > 18 News Service, relies upon police testimony identifying him as the > organiser of the congregation’s 4 September Sunday service "by his outward > appearance." Yurevich had argued that he was on leave at the time, did not > enter the church building and was present only to talk to Mayor of Minsk > Mikhail Pavlov if he accepted New Life’s invitation to speak at the > service about the city authorities’ recent decision to confiscate the > church’s land (see F18News 1 September 2005 > <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=640>). > While meted out milder punishments, a number of other Protestant churches > have also reported recent moves by state officials to limit their > religious activity on the basis of technical violations (see eg. F18News > 30 September 2005 <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=664>). > Yurevich has already been given two similarly massive fines for the same > offence (see F18 News 29 December 2004 > <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=480> and 28 September 2005 > <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=661>), and was on this > third occasion found guilty of violating the procedure for conducting > religious gatherings as set out in the law on demonstrations, whose > requirement of state permission for public meetings was extended in 1999 > to religious organisations in instances where their gatherings are not > held at specially designated religious buildings or sites. > In addition to being refused permission to rent public facilities by > district administrations throughout Minsk, New Life has been denied state > permission to turn a disused cowshed it purchased in 2002 into a church > building as well as to hold services there – on the grounds that it is > technically a cowshed. Similar obstacles have not been placed by the > authorities against an Orthodox community’s use for worship of a disused > railway carriage 500 metres (yards) away from the cowshed (see F18News 21 > February 2005 <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=516>). > The Administrative Violations Code holds the leader and/or organiser of > religious meetings responsible for failing to observe the legal procedure > for holding them. In this latest case, Judge Nadezhda Reutskaya accepted > police officers’ testimony that Yurevich must have been the organiser of > the 4 September service because one policewoman "spoke to him as the > person responsible," "people approached him, he greeted them and invited > them to enter the church" and "his outward appearance differed from church > members, who were simply dressed while he wore a suit." Although New Life > lawyer Sergei Lukanin and a church member told Minsk’s Moscow District > Court that Yurevich was speaking to police and journalists outside the > church and did not participate in the service, Judge Reutskaya ruled that > there was no contradiction between the witness statements and that they > all supported his conviction. > Yurevich, who has paid neither his first nor second fine, has told Forum > 18 that New Life members formally decided on 21 November 2004 that they > attend church services on their own initiative. He is currently preparing > to file an appeal against the latest fine with Minsk City Court. Speaking > to Radio Free Europe in the wake of the fine, New Life’s Pastor Vyacheslav > Goncharenko – who has also been fined for unsanctioned worship (see > F18News > 23 March 2005 <http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=530>) – > insisted that the church would continue to meet for services at its former > cowshed. He also pointed out that the congregation was the first to > encounter such difficulties: "We were the first to be thrown out of houses > of culture. The authorities are banking upon dealing with us first in > order > to intimidate the rest." > This is not the only instance of a repeat fine been handed down to a > church leader. In western Belarus, the pastor of a Pentecostal church in > Kobrin (Brest region) was issued a second fine of 25,000 Belarusian > roubles (74 Norwegian Kroner, 9 Euros or 11 US Dollars) on 17 October for > not having a fire extinguisher of the correct capacity. "I was told I > needed one holding 10 litres, whereas ours holds five or eight," Nikolai > Radkovich commented to the Evangelical Belarus Information Centre. "But I > believe the main reason for the visit was that our church

… read more »

Response:

Pray for the World 28 October 2005 Update From HCJB World Radio Today’s Headlines: RADICAL MUSLIMS HALT CONSTRUCTION OF CHURCH IN INDONESIA CHRISTIANS IN INDIA FACE RENEWED ATTACKS FROM HINDU EXTREMISTS NTM HOPES TO STAY IN VENEZUELA DESPITE PRESIDENT’S ANNOUNCEMENT NUMEROUS NATURAL DISASTERS STRETCH RELIEF AGENCIES TO THE LIMIT Today’s Top Stories: RADICAL MUSLIMS HALT CONSTRUCTION OF CHURCH IN INDONESIA Nine hard-line Islamic organizations have persuaded local officials in the Bekasi district of West Java, Indonesia, to halt the construction of a local church. Church officials had previously secured all government and business permits. Islamic displays of displeasure with the prospective church began on Monday, Sept. 19, when 500 people from the Islamic organizations shouted in unison and raised banners against construction of the church building. About 200 of them came back and demonstrated against the project 10 days later. On Monday, Oct. 3, they again returned and demanded that the project be sealed off from further development, shouting, "There should not be a single church built in the Cikarang area." (Compass) CHRISTIANS IN INDIA FACE RENEWED ATTACKS FROM HINDU EXTREMISTS Christians in India continue to come under attack from Hindu extremists. On Sunday, Oct. 23, out 30 Hindu radicals attacked a pastor, his wife and their driver in western India’s Gujarat state. All three sustained internal injuries. Rev. Arthur Jebaraj, his wife, Nyana Sundari, and their driver, Dattu Daulat, who belong to the Friends Missionary Prayer Band, an indigenous Christian organization, were assaulted at about 11 p.m. as they returned to their home in Chempa after conducting a thanksgiving prayer meeting. The attackers also damaged their vehicle. In a separate incident, attacks from Hindu extremists in the Banswara district of northwestern India’s Rajasthan state resulted in the cancellation of the last day of a revival festival. The violence accelerated on Tuesday, Oct. 25, when the Tribal Christian Welfare Society’s revival meetings began in Sagwa. At least 50 incidences of beatings have occurred since then. The next day government officials ordered the society to cancel the remainder of its three-day festival due to escalating violence. Normally about 15,000 people attend the festival, but only 5,000 made it past marauding extremist gangs before the event was cancelled following a prayer for victims of the attacks. (Compass) NTM HOPES TO STAY IN VENEZUELA DESPITE PRESIDENT’S ANNOUNCEMENT Staff members with New Tribes Missions (NTM) are praying that their ministry will continue among Venezuela’s indigenous tribes even though President Hugo Chavez announced two weeks ago that he is booting the Florida-based Christian mission out of Venezuela. NTM spokeswoman Nita Zelenak said there is still no official expulsion order, and the missionaries don’t plan to leave on the basis of media reports alone. NTM missionaries have been on Venezuelan radio and television, explaining their ministry and denying Chavez’s charge that they’re linked to the Central Intelligence Agency. Since evangelist Pat Robertson called for Chavez’s assassination in August — a remark for which he later apologized — Venezuela has stopped granting visas for foreign missionaries. That also has prompted the Mormon church to remove all of its American missionaries from Venezuela. (AgapePress/Associated Press) NUMEROUS NATURAL DISASTERS STRETCH RELIEF AGENCIES TO THE LIMIT International Aid’s Dean Agee says it has been an extraordinarily difficult year for those who respond to natural disasters around the world. Tsunami response topped by earthquake, famine and hurricane emergencies have stretched their resources to the limit. Yet, he says, it has been equally extraordinary for ministry opportunity. Florida is now reeling from Hurricane Wilma’s rampage. While not as damaging as it could have been, Wilma was the eighth hurricane to hit the state in 15 months. It has been an unusually busy storm year resulting in 22 tropical storms or hurricanes, besting the 1933 storm season. More than 3 million people were left without power and searching for temporary shelter and food. Agee says the organization will be partnering with the Florida Baptist Convention to provide aid. "They’ve got four assessment teams in the field, and then we’ll work with our resources to meet those needs.. We just greatly appreciate the support that folks have given us. We couldn’t do it without their prayers and their financial contributions." (Mission Network News) *Peace of Christ* http://grace.break.at To send e-mail, remove "youhat" from address

Response:

Pray for the World 27 October 2005:  Gaza Residents Experience Effects of the Israeli Sonic Boom          Gaza Residents Experience Effects of the Israeli Sonic Boom               By Allyn Dhynes, Advocacy/PB/Comms Manager, WVJWG   An alarming new military trend has begun in the Gaza Strip just weeks   after  the Israeli disengagement.  In addition to Israeli helicopter gunship  attacks and shelling of Palestinian areas, the Israeli Air Force has begun to fly F-16 fighter jets at low altitudes over the Gaza Strip breaking the  sound barrier up to seven or eight times a day.  The result has been the  widespread shock and trauma for Gaza

Question:

>Since I know you won’t, I give you one example because others >are smart enough to know where more are in the >now go get on your own throne and stop slandering me >demon and I won’t apologize for calling you such for your spirit

First of all, it would be libel, not slander. Secondly, a message containing only your claim of it, is not proof. Thirdly, here are your words… Beth: I am not a Christian. Beth: We have spent a LOT of time and money comparing and seeking originals of manuscripts and texts and the bible that Christians use is full of falsehoods that were added. Pastor Dave:  The Bible as we have it,                           is the word of God. Libertarius: That is just a DUMB-ASS-ertion! Beth: Yes, it is, only I wouldn’t have put it like that.  As I used to say the same myself and I think I did somewhere recently.  I was shown in proof that it is not. Enough proof for me from several  who would know.  I have waited for almost two years to decided what was truth for me, carrying myself as a Christian-not in label, but in belief.  I can put 2+2 together for myself. The word of God is true,  the ones from man is not true. — Pastor Dave "I am not permitted to let my love be so merciful as to tolerate and endure false doctrine.  When faith and doctrine are concerned and endangered, neither love nor patience are in order…  For a defective life does not destroy Christendom, but exercises it.  However, defective doctrine and false faith ruin everything.  Therefore, when these are concerned, neither toleration nor mercy are in order, but only anger, dispute and destruction – to be sure, only with the Word of God as our weapon." – Martin Luther

Response:

Since I know you won’t, I give you one example because others are smart enough to know where more are in the now go get on your own throne and stop slandering me demon and I won’t apologize for calling you such for your spirit  studying Paul’s own words, "I speak not by Commandment … and herein I give my advice" (2 Cor. 8: 8-10). Paul’s "advice" undoubtedly was good,  but it certainly was not always the Word of God. Now notice the two different sources of the commands which Paul has written:  "Unto the married I command, yet not I,  but the Lord .., but the rest is from me, not from the Lord" (I Cor. 7:10-12). The apostle here makes it plain that he sometimes wrote what God commanded; and sometimes he wrote his own advice. The apostle himself is showing that these "Words from the Lord" are superior to his own remarks. "This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord" (Eph.4:17) Here also, the apostle is explaining that the Lord is his authority for this particular statement.  It all of his words were to be considered as verbal inspiration from God, there would be no need for him to use the qualifying  phrases:  "of the Lord " and "in the Lord" DUR there are many examples in John and others where they say specifically This is of the Lord, or Verily says the Lord., Messiah-Jesus To go after me as you have done is to show that you are what you Beth – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What does Yochanan–HEBREW FOR JOHN–see its in MY BIBLE > TOO!/John 7 say. The Messiah says it!!!!! in red > letters —–Look at verse 18 for yourself –while > looking into a mirror and don’t come back and tell a lie > here, do you see you doing this? Speaking of > yourself……. DUH Messianic Jews use Tenach, it is the > same moron. > The Tanach is in Hebrew on one side and in English on the > -Torah only includes the OT….(and even some of those > bought in the USA include the prophets and writings)— > When you learn the difference between a Messianic Jew and > a Orthodox Jew you can add something -and I could be > patient EXCEPT for the fact that you wish to cut me down, > when you have no clue what your talking about…..until > seek your own glory . > 16 Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not > mine, but his that sent me. 17 If any man will do his > will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of > God, or whether I speak of myself. *18 He that speaketh > of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his > glory that sent him, the same is true, and no > unrighteousness is in him. 19 Did not Moses give you the > law, and yet none of you keepeth the law? Why go ye about > to kill me? 20 The people answered and said, Thou hast a > devil: who goeth about to kill thee? 21 Jesus answered > and said unto them, I have done one work, and ye all > marvel. 22 Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; > (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers;) and ye > on the sabbath day circumcise a man. 23 If a man on the > sabbath day receive circumcision, that F16 the law of > Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I > have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day? 24 > Judge not according to the appearance, but judge > **righteous judgment. > Dave, a MESSIAH -JESUS- to you -believing Jewish person > is one who reads the Torah-PROPHETS AND WRITINGS and > observes..not one who leaves out areas of God’s > truth…Prophets and writings,,,,,,,,get it John Matthew > Luke James Paul etc etc etc……. >  Only a person who’s spirit is like yours can’t see the > truth Dave……I will post another example for you, if > you answer this first, do you think that every word of > the bible is God’s word?? EVERY SINGLE>? or are some > mans? God yes, allowed man to write some of his ventures > for us to know better before we do it. take Abraham who > got drunk, Moses who had an anger problem, ..that isn’t > what I am asking though…..where in the bible does it > say–USE YOURS–where MAN Wrote and not God…….give > ONE example…..is there one?? YES there is > Prophet wrote on his own accord Dave. It is there, if you > study so much and say the rest of us are so stupid > like usual. > So where is it that I CHOPPED Dave? HUM? I don’t choose > God’s word it has already been……and yes > Christianity-that means Roman Influence did infact add to > the bible……ask a Scholar cause I am not debiting that > fact with you, but don’t pretend that you know cause you > don’t, the fact that you don’t would be fine, it takes > study, but the fact that you seat yourself above is not > the spirit of Yeshua. > Do you know the differences, no, please try to before you > attack me and try to show that your so smart. > Beth

Response:

Question:

We can now expect Paxi and company, to compare *their* figures, ususally in the 100,000+ range, to these figures. Certainly, Paxi didn’t come up with that figure on his own, but it fits his *vision* of reality and surely he’ll stick with it. http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/07/19/iraq.bodycount.reut/index.html It can be noted that the article claims approx 37% of these deaths due to American/coalition military action.  The balance are due to criminals (36% ?!) and insurgents. The very low insurgency rate gets a very *opinionated* comment from the reporter… Speaking of numbers…. Anybody notice how there is virtually ZERO *outrage* or even mere *commentary* from the press that 100…  that’s 100, rockets were fired by Palestinians into Israel. Imagine if say, Iran fired 100 rockets into Russia… gtski

Response:

>We can now expect Paxi and company, to compare *their* figures, >ususally in the 100,000+ range, to these figures. Certainly, Paxi >didn’t come up with that figure on his own, but it fits his *vision* >of reality and surely he’ll stick with it. >http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/07/19/iraq.bodycount.reut/index.html >It can be noted that the article claims approx 37% of these deaths due >to American/coalition military action.  The balance are due to >criminals (36% ?!) and insurgents. >The very low insurgency rate gets a very *opinionated* comment from >the reporter…

I’m sure that the reporter checked into his figures about as thoroughly as Dan Blather checked his so called facts. They cater to the people who gobble up their stories, and declair them to be facts, just because they saw it on the CNN Entertaiment Network. (CNNEN) >Speaking of numbers…. >Anybody notice how there is virtually ZERO *outrage* or even mere >*commentary* from the press that 100…  that’s 100, rockets were >fired by Palestinians into Israel. Imagine if say, Iran fired 100 >rockets into Russia… >gtski

The Palestinians are lucky that Israel isn’t Russia.  Russia’d play hardball. Pete — What, are you kidding?  They’re my best friends. That’s why I married you, so I wouldn’t have them anymore!   –Space Ghost to Bjork

Response:

> The Palestinians are lucky that Israel isn’t Russia.  Russia’d play > hardball.

http://www.hcef.org/hcef/index.cfm/ID/31.cfm  How has Isreal killed them more softly??? Not just Arabic Palestinians but Christian ones as well.

Response:

Christian Voices from the Holy Land In We Belong to the Land (Harper Collins, 1990), Father Elias Chacour, parish priest of lbillin, Israel, described the destruction in 1953 by the Israeli military of Biram, his family’s village in Palestine. The Biram villagers gathered on a nearby hill, weeping as they watched explosives being put in place around their houses. Then Israeli Air Force planes roared over them and began bombing the village. In horror my family saw the houses explode and the trees catch fire. The screaming villagers ran to the edge of Biram and saw that bulldozers were already working to complete the destruction. Soldiers met the people and said, ‘If you want to return now, you can go. The bulldozers will bury you under the rubble of the houses’. He goes on to explain why the loss of land is especially devastating for Palestinians. Mobile Western people have difficulty comprehending the significance of the land for Palestinians. We belong to the land. We identify with the land, which has been treasured, cultivated, and nurtured by countless generations of ancestors. Some of our trees were planted more than a thousand years ago… Other trees in our village were closer to two thousand years old. People in our generation plant trees for their children’s children. H. B. Michel Sabbah, Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. Easter Message, 1998 The promise of total freedom remains a pure promise. In the meanwhile, the fabric of society is beginning to disintegrate. Suffering, death and emigration are going on and prisoners are waiting in their prisons to be given back their freedom and dignity. The picture is dark. This is the reality there is no alternative to peace, a true peace based on justice and dignity for every person, every community and people. It is difficult, if not impossible, to begin reconciliation as long as there are injustices imposed upon one party. Mitri Rabeb Palestinian Evangelical Lutheran Pastor living in Bethlehem, From I Am A Palestinian Christian (Fortress Press, 1995) I am a Palestinian living under Israeli occupation. My captor daily seeks to make life harder for me. He encircles my people with barbed wire; he builds walls around us and his armies set many boundaries. He succeeds in keeping thousands of us in camps and prisons. Yet, he has not succeeded in keeping my dreams from me… I have a dream of two people who live side by side in peace with one another. I think of two people who keep the name of God holy and do not misuse it to further their own interest and suppress others. Canon Naim Ateek Anglican Canon of St. George’s Cathedral, East Jerusalem. From Justice and Only Justice (Orbis Books, 1997) The conflict, indeed, was political… it had to do with the usurpation of a country with the expropriation of land, with refugees, with the denial of the political and human rights of an entire people. The church suffered, as its people suffered, not because of their faith, but because they were Palestinians. Thus, inadvertently, the church was caught in the midst of political forces and became a victim itself… Salim J. Munayer Palestinian Greek Orthodox Christian and Professor, Bethlehem Bible College The Palestinian Christians in the State of Israel are calling for freedom of religion for all religious groups, not only freedom of worship, but freedom to be able to express their faith to others without restrictions. Christians are called to be peacemakers. Palestinian Christians are calling for peace between Israeli Jews and Palestinians for an end to the occupation in the West Bank and Gaza so that their people will be able to form their own destiny and shape their future. The daily misery, the killing, the economic conditions, sometimes make it impossible to see a positive light in the relationship between Israeli Jews and Palestinian Christians in the occupied territories. http://www.hcef.org/hcef/index.cfm/ID/129.cfm

Response:

> The Palestinians are lucky that Israel isn’t Russia.  Russia’d play > hardball. > http://www.hcef.org/hcef/index.cfm/ID/31.cfm  How has Isreal killed > them more softly??? Not just Arabic Palestinians but Christian ones as > well.

a few years ago, there were a lot of kidnappings of westerners, particularly in Lebanon, by various islamic extremists. most spent years in captivity before being released or killed. one militant group crossed the line and kidnapped a russian diplomat. within a couple of days, the brother of the leader of the group that had grabbed him, turned up dead in the middle of town. he had been castrated, and his ‘parts’ were found in his mouth. the leader himself turned up dead within a couple of weeks. the russian diplomat was killed, of course, but he was the last russian to be kidnapped. THAT is hardball. Israel is a kind and gentle nation by comparison. in my opinion, they are often TOO soft and gentle. paul az

Response:

> Yo, precious — criminals and insurgence are a side effect of the US > invasion.  That stuff wasn’t happening when Saddam was still in power.

True, estimates are the deaths were at a HIGHER rate under Saddam. While all civilian deaths are tragic, 25,000 over a few years is less than what estimates have run about what Saddam was doing to other tribes, sects, and dissidents. See ya, John

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We can now expect Paxi and company, to compare *their* figures, ususally > in the 100,000+ range, to these figures. Certainly, Paxi didn’t come up > with that figure on his own, but it fits his *vision* of reality and > surely he’ll stick with it. > http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/07/19/iraq.bodycount.reut/index.html > It can be noted that the article claims approx 37% of these deaths due to > American/coalition military action.  The balance are due to criminals (36% > ?!) and insurgents. > The very low insurgency rate gets a very *opinionated* comment from the > reporter… > Speaking of numbers…. > Anybody notice how there is virtually ZERO *outrage* or even mere > *commentary* from the press that 100…  that’s 100, rockets were fired by > Palestinians into Israel. Imagine if say, Iran fired 100 rockets into > Russia… > gtski

Curious. Anyone care to research how many U.S. civilians died violent deaths in the past couple years?  And what percentage of them were killed by foreign forces?

Response:

> My point was that the capital was secure from the kind of terrifying > random > crime that is now occuring… yeah Saddam was a murdering thug… but > people in the capital could at least have business as usual. Even by > conservative estimates, at least many civilians have now been killed in > the > war as Saddam killed when he was in power.  The difference being that > Saddam is now finished, but we aren’t.

I don’t remember what the numbers were but it was something like 70% of Iraq is peaceful, so for many of those residents, life is better than before. When resident troops and police are to a point that they can handle their own problems, it will be better for the entire country. See ya, John

Response:

dead is dead, nice dead or bad dead. What difference does it make that you were bombed from the sky into a million bits or cut by a knife onto five or six pieces? One is impersonal and clean while one is personal and dirty? The victim is still D E A D. The victims relations are P I S S E D. They are gonna want R E V E N G E. Say did you realize that 20 Americans were disappeared in Nuevo Larado last year? Another war we’re losing bad – the drug war – also connected to the war on terror. I didn’t post pictures of dead palestinian kids or their homes being bulldozed or the kind of poverty they’re being forced into, or their olive orchards being ripped out of the earth. Dang, what would you do to someone who did these things to you? Make nice? Invite them to supper? Pray for them???? Marry their daughter?

Response:

> Curious. > Anyone care to research how many U.S. civilians died violent deaths in the > past couple years?  And what percentage of them were killed by foreign > forces?

It would also be interesting to know how many of those 25,000 in Iraq were crime, and how many were insurgents, since they were included. See ya! John

Response:

>>It can be noted that the article claims approx 37% of these deaths due >to American/coalition military action.  The balance are due to >criminals (36% ?!) and insurgents. > Yo, precious — criminals and insurgence are a side effect of the US > invasion.  That stuff wasn’t happening when Saddam was still in power.

Oh really, spanky.. ??  I guess they aren’t having any trials in Iraq for "crimes against humanity"..???  And who exactly released the criminals from prisons..? ? ?  Then again, who would think YOU knew or would know what was happening in Iraq while Saddam was "still in power"…?? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> your name here!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->We can now expect Paxi and company, to compare *their* figures, >ususally in the 100,000+ range, to these figures. Certainly, Paxi >didn’t come up with that figure on his own, but it fits his *vision* >of reality and surely he’ll stick with it. >http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/07/19/iraq.bodycount.reut/index.html >It can be noted that the article claims approx 37% of these deaths due >to American/coalition military action.  The balance are due to >criminals (36% ?!) and insurgents. >The very low insurgency rate gets a very *opinionated* comment from >the reporter… > I’m sure that the reporter checked into his figures about as > thoroughly as Dan Blather checked his so called facts. > They cater to the people who gobble up their stories, and declair them > to be facts, just because they saw it on the CNN Entertaiment Network. > (CNNEN) >Speaking of numbers…. >Anybody notice how there is virtually ZERO *outrage* or even mere >*commentary* from the press that 100…  that’s 100, rockets were >fired by Palestinians into Israel. Imagine if say, Iran fired 100 >rockets into Russia… >gtski > The Palestinians are lucky that Israel isn’t Russia.  Russia’d play > hardball.

Absolutely right. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Pete > — > What, are you kidding?  They’re my best friends. > That’s why I married you, so I wouldn’t have them anymore! >   –Space Ghost to Bjork

Response:

More fun with statistics: Iraqi death toll Boris Khadinov This morning I heard a report on TV – Fox I think, but it could have been CNN, about the mounting death toll in Iraq. The hawk guest quickly noted that Saddam killed an estimated 35 people per day from the time he took control of Iraq. 35 per day! That’s a staggering number. And then I thought, hmm, how many people have died since the beginning of the war? The war started on March 19, 2003 and has been going for 467 days if my math is correct. Casualties: Iraqi civilians (estimate): 9451 to 11,333 Iraqi soldiers (estimate): 4,895 to 6,370 U.S. soldiers: 854 This is certainly not a complete list, but for the sake of argument let’s assume it is, and let’s just look at the Iraqi casualties mentioned here. With that we have the following estimates: (9451 + 4895)/467 = 30.7 dead Iraqis per day minimum (6370 + 11,333)/467 = 37.9 dead Iraqis per day maximum So, to liberate Iraq from a dictator who killed 35 Iraqis per day, on average, our actions have directly or indirectly caused the deaths of 31 to 38 Iraqis per day, on average. In other words, it is basically a statistical wash. I’m sure Iraqis take comfort in knowing that, though they are dying at the same rate, they are dying for a better cause. Let freedom reign!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Yo, precious — criminals and insurgence are a side effect of the US >>invasion.  That stuff wasn’t happening when Saddam was still in power. >True, estimates are the deaths were at a HIGHER rate under Saddam. While all >civilian deaths are tragic, 25,000 over a few years is less than what >estimates have run about what Saddam was doing to other tribes, sects, and >dissidents. > My point was that the capital was secure from the kind of terrifying random > crime that is now occuring…

Except your *point* is incorrect.  It wasn’t *safe*… and that is why so many people were fleeing Baghdad during his regime (if they could). The *random* crime under Saddam was institutional rape, torture, killing, incarceration..etc. > yeah Saddam was a murdering thug… but > people in the capital could at least have business as usual.

And of course YOU assume "buisiness as usual" was like "sleepy-town" america where everyone was safe and could do what they wanted, and never worried about their family… > Even by conservative estimates, at least many civilians have now been killed in the > war as Saddam killed when he was in power.  

Me thinks your figures are more than a "tad" off….  re-check them and get back to us.  If like Paxi, your numbers are the only numbers that matter to you, never mind. > The difference being that Saddam is now finished, but we aren’t.

What makes you think Saddams *people* are "finished"…???  Maybe you’re unaware that *some* of the insurgency is "run" by Iraqis, and much of it is run by foreignors…  Further, most (if not all) of the suicide bombers are foreigners (since they can’t get Iraqis to kill their countrymen this way). But don’t let that get in they way of your dogma… Carry on. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> your name here!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Curious. >Anyone care to research how many U.S. civilians died violent deaths in the >past couple years?  And what percentage of them were killed by foreign >forces? > It would also be interesting to know how many of those 25,000 in Iraq were > crime, and how many were insurgents, since they were included. > See ya! > John

IIRC, it was in the link… I think it was 24,865 total…  37% military action… 36% *criminal* killings… and 9% due to "anti-occupation forces". Although maybe you mean the deaths of insurgents *themselves*..???  I don’t remember if those deaths are included in the numbers.  IIRC, IRAQI military deaths were NOT included.  This was merely *civilian* deaths. gtski

Response:

> in the 100,000+ range

1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq.

Response:

worth noting: from today’s Boston Globe (via Cursor): New investigations by the Saudi Arabian government and an Israeli think tank — both of which painstakingly analyzed the backgrounds and motivations of hundreds of foreigners entering Iraq to fight the United States — have found that the vast majority of these foreign fighters are not former terrorists and became radicalized by the war itself. The studies, which together constitute the most detailed picture available of foreign fighters, cast serious doubt on President Bush’s claim that those responsible for some of the worst violence are terrorists who seized on the opportunity to make Iraq the ”central front" in a battle against the United States… … "To say we must fight them in Baghdad so we don’t have to fight them in Boston implies there is a finite number of people, and if you pen them up in Iraq you can kill them all," said [nonpartisan terrorism analyst Peter] Bergen. ”The truth is we increased the pool by what we did in Iraq." Intelligence officials worry that some of ”Iraq alumni" will use the relationships they build on the battlefields of Iraq and return to their home countries as hardened Islamic terrorists. Bottom line: Bush’s Iraq war — which has nothing to do with fighting Al-Qaeda and never did — is making another attack here more likely, not less. At least according to the wild-eyed liberals in, um, Saudi Arabia. (And hey, what experience could Israelis possibly have with terrorism?)

Response:

video here http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html

Response:

http://www.whodies.com/popup.html?stats nice sound track

Response:

>>But don’t let that get in they way of your dogma… > I can see your own dogma ran over your karma….

We ALL can see you know nothing of karma. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> your name here!

Response:

>>in the 100,000+ range > 1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq.

How many in France.. ? ?   Italy..? ? ? Okinawa.. ? ? ?  Mexico . . ? ? ?

Response:

courageously avow: >>in the 100,000+ range > 1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq. >How many in France.. ? ?   Italy..? ? ? >Okinawa.. ? ? ?  Mexico . . ? ? ?

Apples/Oranges Ken Wilson Proud Owner of LV, Jet Ski, John Boy Wheaton, Clod  and the rest of the Union of Rightwing Idiots Needing Explantions (URINE) www.resisters.ca

Response:

You’re dignifying the living dead Ken… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > courageously avow: >>>in the 100,000+ range >>1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq. >How many in France.. ? ?   Italy..? ? ? >Okinawa.. ? ? ?  Mexico . . ? ? ? > Apples/Oranges > Ken Wilson > Proud Owner of LV, Jet Ski, John Boy Wheaton, Clod >  and the rest of the Union of Rightwing Idiots Needing Explantions (URINE) > www.resisters.ca

Response:

> > 1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq. > How many in France.. ? ?   Italy..? ? ? > Okinawa.. ? ? ?  Mexico . . ? ? ?

Since we invaded Iraq based on lies?

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > courageously avow: >>>in the 100,000+ range >>1769 American soldiers killed in Iraq. >How many in France.. ? ?   Italy..? ? ? >Okinawa.. ? ? ?  Mexico . . ? ? ? > Apples/Oranges

Nope.  You’re wrong as usual. Casualties are casualties… You might as well also fill us in on the these casualty figures as well…  How many in Vietnam…??  The Phillipines..??  China..?? Cuba..? ? ?   North Africa…???  The Phillipines the second time..??? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Ken Wilson > Proud Owner of LV, Jet Ski, John Boy Wheaton, Clod >  and the rest of the Union of Rightwing Idiots Needing Explantions (URINE) > www.resisters.ca

Response:

Question:

Dr. Hager’s Family Values by AYELISH MCGARVEY May 30, 2005 issue of The Nation Late last October Dr. W. David Hager, a prominent obstetrician-gynecologist and Bush Administration appointee to the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), took to the pulpit as the featured speaker at a morning service. He stood in the campus chapel at Asbury College, a small evangelical Christian school nestled among picturesque horse farms in the small town of Wilmore in Kentucky’s bluegrass region. Hager is an Asburian nabob; his elderly father is a past president of the college, and Hager himself currently sits on his alma mater’s board of trustees. Even the school’s administrative building, Hager Hall, bears the family name. That day, a mostly friendly audience of 1,500 students and faculty packed into the seats in front of him. With the autumn sunlight streaming through the stained-glass windows, Hager opened his Bible to the Old Testament Book of Ezekiel and looked out into the audience. "I want to share with you some information about how…God has called me to stand in the gap," he declared. "Not only for others, but regarding ethical and moral issues in our country." For Hager, those moral and ethical issues all appear to revolve around sex: In both his medical practice and his advisory role at the FDA, his ardent evangelical piety anchors his staunch opposition to emergency contraception, abortion and premarital sex. Through his six books–which include such titles as Stress and the Woman’s Body and As Jesus Cared for Women, self-help tomes that interweave syrupy Christian spirituality with paternalistic advice on women’s health and relationships–he has established himself as a leading conservative Christian voice on women’s health and sexuality. And because of his warm relationship with the Bush Administration, Hager has had the opportunity to see his ideas influence federal policy. In December 2003 the FDA advisory committee of which he is a member was asked to consider whether emergency contraception, known as Plan B, should be made available over the counter. Over Hager’s dissent, the committee voted overwhelmingly to approve the change. But the FDA rejected its recommendation, a highly unusual and controversial decision in which Hager, The Nation has learned, played a key role. Hager’s reappointment to the committee, which does not require Congressional approval, is expected this June, but Bush’s nomination of Dr. Lester Crawford as FDA director has been bogged down in controversy over the issue of emergency contraception. Crawford was acting director throughout the Plan B debacle, and Senate Democrats, led by Hillary Clinton and Patty Murray, are holding up his nomination until the agency revisits its decision about going over the counter with the pill. When Hager’s nomination to the FDA was announced in the fall of 2002, his conservative Christian beliefs drew sharp criticism from Democrats and prochoice groups. David Limbaugh, the lesser light in the Limbaugh family and author of Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging Political War Against Christianity, said the left had subjected Hager to an "anti-Christian litmus test." Hager’s valor in the face of this "religious profiling" earned him the praise and lasting support of evangelical Christians, including such luminaries as Charles Colson, Dr. James Dobson and Franklin Graham, son of the Rev. Billy Graham. Back at Asbury, Hager cast himself as a victim of religious persecution in his sermon. "You see…there is a war going on in this country," he said gravely. "And I’m not speaking about the war in Iraq. It’s a war being waged against Christians, particularly evangelical Christians. It wasn’t my scientific record that came under scrutiny [at the FDA]. It was my faith…. By making myself available, God has used me to stand in the breach…. Just as he has used me, he can use you." Up on the dais, several men seated behind Hager nodded solemnly in agreement. But out in the audience, Linda Carruth Davis–co-author with Hager of Stress and the Woman’s Body, and, more saliently, his former wife of thirty-two years–was enraged. "It was the most disgusting thing I’ve ever heard," she recalled months later, through clenched teeth. According to Davis, Hager’s public moralizing on sexual matters clashed with his deplorable treatment of her during their marriage. Davis alleges that between 1995 and their divorce in 2002, Hager repeatedly sodomized her without her consent. Several sources on and off the record confirmed that she had told them it was the sexual and emotional abuse within their marriage that eventually forced her out. "I probably wouldn’t have objected so much, or felt it was so abusive if he had just wanted normal [vaginal] sex all the time," she explained to me. "But it was the painful, invasive, totally nonconsensual nature of the [anal] sex that was so horrible." Not once during the uproar over Hager’s FDA appointment did any reporter solicit the opinion of the woman now known as Linda Davis–she remarried in November 2002 to James Davis, a Methodist minister, and relocated to southern Georgia–on her husband’s record, even though she contributed to much of his self-help work in the Christian arena (she remains a religious and political conservative). She intermittently thought of telling her story but refrained, she says, out of respect for her adult children. It was Hager’s sermon at Asbury last October that finally changed her mind. Davis was there to hear her middle son give a vocal performance; she was prepared to hear her ex-husband inveigh against secular liberals, but she was shocked to hear him speak about their divorce when he took to the pulpit. "In early 2002," Hager told the churchgoers that day, "my world fell apart…. After thirty-two years of marriage, I was suddenly alone in a new home that we had built as our dream home. Time spent ‘doing God’s will’ had kept me from spending the time I needed to nourish my marriage." Hager noted with pride that in his darkest hour, Focus on the Family estimated that 50 million people worldwide were praying for him. Linda Davis quietly fumed in her chair. "He had the gall to stand under the banner of holiness of the Lord and lie, by the sin of omission," she told me. "It’s what he didn’t say–it’s the impression he left." David Hager is not the fringe character and fundamentalist faith healer that some of his critics have made him out to be. In fact, he is a well-credentialed doctor. In Kentucky Hager has long been recognized as a leading Ob-Gyn at Lexington’s Central Baptist Hospital and a faculty member at the University of Kentucky’s medical school. And in the 1990s several magazines, including Modern Healthcare and Good Housekeeping, counted him among the best doctors for women in the nation. Yet while Hager doesn’t advocate the substitution of conservative Christianity for medicine, his religious ideology underlies an all-encompassing paternalism in his approach to his women patients. "Even though I was trained as a medical specialist," Hager explained in the preface to As Jesus Cared for Women, "it wasn’t until I began to see how Jesus treated women that I understood how I, as a doctor, should treat them." To underscore this revelation, Hager recounted case after case in which he acted as confidant, spiritual adviser and even father figure to his grateful patients. As laid out in his writings, Hager’s worldview is not informed by a sense of inherent equality between men and women. Instead, men are expected to act as benevolent authority figures for the women in their lives. (In one of his books, he refers to a man who raped his wife as "selfish" and "sinful.") But to model gender relations on the one Jesus had with his followers is to leave women dangerously exposed in the event that the men in their lives don’t meet the high standard set by God Himself–trapped in a permanent state of dependence hoping to be treated well. In tandem with his medical career, Hager has been an aggressive advocate for the political agenda of the Christian right. A member of Focus on the Family’s Physician Resource Council and the Christian Medical and Dental Society, Hager assisted the Concerned Women for America in submitting a "Citizen’s Petition" to the FDA in August 2002 to halt distribution and marketing of the abortion pill, RU-486. It was this record of conservative activism that ignited a firestorm when the Bush Administration first floated his name for chairman of the FDA’s advisory committee in the fall of 2002. In the end, the FDA found a way to dodge the controversy: It issued a stealth announcement of Hager’s appointment to the panel (to be one of eleven members, not chairman) on Christmas Eve. Liberals were furious that they weren’t able to block his appointment. For many months afterward, an outraged chain letter alerting women to the appointment of a man with religious views "far outside the mainstream" snaked its way around the Internet, lending the whole episode the air of urban legend. Back in Lexington, where the couple continued to live, Linda Hager, as she was still known at the time, was sinking into a deep depression, she says. Though her marriage had been dead for nearly a decade, she could not see her way clear to divorce; she had no money of her own and few marketable skills. But life with David Hager had grown unbearable. As his public profile increased, so did the tension in their home, which she says periodically triggered episodes of abuse. "I would be asleep," she recalls, "and since [the sodomy] was painful and threatening, I woke up. Sometimes I acquiesced once he had started, just to make it go … read more »

Response:

why is that repression generates sexual wierdos?  You know it’s all "her" fault. She disobeyed the lord and her husband, a "real" gentleman.

Response:

Question:

If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the last election it’s your fault.

Response:

> If this latest step down the road toward fascism

doesn’t scare the crap > out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted

for a Republican in the > last election it’s your fault.

It sure is, but all the little piglets think the world will come to an end before they have to face the evil in themselves and what their stupidity brought them.

Response:

> If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap > out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the > last election it’s your fault.

While I do have some concerns, some kind of standardization of indentification isn`t a bad idea. As usual, the devil`s in the details… BTW Watch for considerable Dem support, so don`t make it a Republican issue. Illegal immigation is a very real problem, as 9/11 proved. See ya, John

Response:

>If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap >out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the >last election it’s your fault.

The most insidious thing about that despicable piece of crap is that it’s imbedded in an appropriation for American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan — making it politically difficult for legislators to vote against it. Where are the libertarians and the "mark of the beast" faction when our liberties are threatened from the American right rather than by swarthy foreigners with strange languages and religions?  Are you people like the fanatical fundies who view federal interference in private matters as just fine as long as federal policy is on their ideological side?  Can you imagine the uproar on the right if this atrocious erosion of personal freedom had been proposed by a Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you folks be pissed!!!        Posted via TITANnews – Uncensored Newsgroups Access              >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<< -=Every Newsgroup – Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

Response:

Oh my god, proving citizenship to get a license. Jesus, get the firing squad.

Response:

> uproar on the right if this > atrocious erosion of personal > freedom had been proposed by a > Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you > folks be pissed!!!

I don`t agree with all of your conclusion. I abhor that this is a rider on a Military Appropriation Bill,( it wasn`t too long ago that someone in this forum REFUSED to believe in Appropriation Bills). I absolutely HATE, yes I did use that word, HATE the way that riders are used. That said, something along the lines of standardizing of ID needs to be done, but how to do it. Again, the devil`s in the details. See ya, John

Response:

> > If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap > out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the > last election it’s your fault. > While I do have some concerns, some kind of standardization of > indentification isn`t a bad idea. As usual, the devil`s in the details…

Details? They’re going to have a nationwide data and it’ll include YOU. You’ll have to show four, count ‘em four, pieces of evidence that they’ll have to verify just to renew your driver’s license. Do you think it’ll have ANY effect on terrorists bent on mischief? Not in the least. Will it mean hundreds of thousands more unlicensed, uninsured drivers sharing the roads with you and your family? Sure will. Just another step on the road to a totalitarian America. > BTW Watch for considerable Dem support

The Republicans shoe-horned it onto a bill providing money for our troops in Iraq so that they could pull a fast one on any Dems that may have wanted to fight the "Real ID" bill. Shameless politicing on the part of Hastert and Delay. > Illegal immigation is a very real problem, as 9/11 proved.

Bullshit. Illegal immigration has NOTHING to do with 9/11. That was a criminal act, nothing more. Remember that Oklahoma City was perpetrated by a bunch of good old American boys.

Response:

> > uproar on the right if this > atrocious erosion of personal > freedom had been proposed by a > Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you > folks be pissed!!! > I don`t agree with all of your conclusion. I abhor that this is a rider on a > Military Appropriation Bill,( it wasn`t too long ago that someone in this > forum REFUSED to believe in Appropriation Bills). I absolutely HATE, yes I > did use that word, HATE the way that riders are used. That said, something > along the lines of standardizing of ID needs to be done, but how to do it. > Again, the devil`s in the details.

"The Devil’s In The Details" is nothing more than a weasel attempt to justify facism.

Response:

thousands more unlicensed, uninsured drivers > sharing the roads with you and your family?

The illegals that are here need to be sent back after their illegal autos are impounded. > Just another step on the road to a totalitarian America.

Again, our system won`t allow that to happen. You`re on over amp! > The Republicans shoe-horned it onto a bill providing money for our > troops in Iraq so that they could pull a fast one on any Dems that may > have wanted to fight the "Real ID" bill. Shameless politicing on the > part of Hastert and Delay.

Come on your "The Republicana are coming!!!" routine is getting a bit old. However, I do agree that riders like this one are complete BULLSHIT. I HATE the whole rider BS. Each item should be able to stand  a vote on it`s own. > Illegal immigation is a very real problem, as 9/11 proved. > Bullshit. Illegal immigration has NOTHING to do with 9/11. That was a > criminal act, nothing more.

Most of the perpatrators of 9/11 were here illegally. Al Queda has declared WAR on the US, and that was done BEFORE 9/11. It was an Act of WAR, NOT a criminal act. >Remember that Oklahoma City was perpetrated > by a bunch of good old American boys.

And they earned the Death Penalty, more than McVey should have been executed for that. See ya, John

Response:

> "The Devil’s In The Details" is nothing more than a weasel attempt to > justify facism.

You are being irrational again. This is a Democracty, and a pretty well designed one. So cut that out! Some standardization of ID needs to happen. We need to enforce immigration law, and we need to be able to track those that only have temporary permission to be here. That`s what I was talking about when I said that the Devil was in the details. You knew exactly what I meant, and your hyperbole was dishonest, misleading at best. See ya, John

Response:

> If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap > out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the > last election it’s your fault.

I was *pissed* at my last drivers license renewal. They required *fingerprints*!!! I dunno about other states, but that was a first for me here. Between the photo and prints I felt personally violated; like I was being booked, though no crime had been committed. John King

Response:

A+ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap >out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the >last election it’s your fault. > The most insidious thing about > that despicable piece of crap > is that it’s imbedded in an > appropriation for American > troops in Iraq and Afghanistan > — making it politically > difficult for legislators to > vote against it. > Where are the libertarians and > the "mark of the beast" > faction when our liberties are > threatened from the American > right rather than by swarthy > foreigners with strange > languages and religions?  Are > you people like the fanatical > fundies who view federal > interference in private matters > as just fine as long as federal > policy is on their ideological > side?  Can you imagine the > uproar on the right if this > atrocious erosion of personal > freedom had been proposed by a > Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you > folks be pissed!!! >        Posted via TITANnews – Uncensored Newsgroups Access >              >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<< > -=Every Newsgroup – Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

Response:

A – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Oh my god, proving citizenship to get a license. Jesus, get the firing > squad.

Response:

Lame atempt to have it both ways. F – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->uproar on the right if this >atrocious erosion of personal >freedom had been proposed by a >Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you >folks be pissed!!! > I don`t agree with all of your conclusion. I abhor that this is a rider on a > Military Appropriation Bill,( it wasn`t too long ago that someone in this > forum REFUSED to believe in Appropriation Bills). I absolutely HATE, yes I > did use that word, HATE the way that riders are used. That said, something > along the lines of standardizing of ID needs to be done, but how to do it. > Again, the devil`s in the details. > See ya, > John

Response:

Failure to point out the ease of document forgery w/ modern technology. B+ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>If this latest step down the road toward fascism doesn’t scare the crap >>out of you then you’re brain dead. If you voted for a Republican in the >>last election it’s your fault. >While I do have some concerns, some kind of standardization of >indentification isn`t a bad idea. As usual, the devil`s in the details… > Details? They’re going to have a nationwide data and it’ll include YOU. > You’ll have to show four, count ‘em four, pieces of evidence that > they’ll have to verify just to renew your driver’s license. Do you think > it’ll have ANY effect on terrorists bent on mischief? Not in the least. > Will it mean hundreds of thousands more unlicensed, uninsured drivers > sharing the roads with you and your family? Sure will. > Just another step on the road to a totalitarian America. >BTW Watch for considerable Dem support > The Republicans shoe-horned it onto a bill providing money for our > troops in Iraq so that they could pull a fast one on any Dems that may > have wanted to fight the "Real ID" bill. Shameless politicing on the > part of Hastert and Delay. >Illegal immigation is a very real problem, as 9/11 proved. > Bullshit. Illegal immigration has NOTHING to do with 9/11. That was a > criminal act, nothing more. Remember that Oklahoma City was perpetrated > by a bunch of good old American boys.

Response:

A – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>uproar on the right if this >>atrocious erosion of personal >>freedom had been proposed by a >>Democrat?  Boy howdy, would you >>folks be pissed!!! >I don`t agree with all of your conclusion. I abhor that this is a rider on a >Military Appropriation Bill,( it wasn`t too long ago that someone in this >forum REFUSED to believe in Appropriation Bills). I absolutely HATE, yes I >did use that word, HATE the way that riders are used. That said, something >along the lines of standardizing of ID needs to be done, but how to do it. >Again, the devil`s in the details. > "The Devil’s In The Details" is nothing more than a weasel attempt to > justify facism.

Response:

Quite possibly phuctarded. Demoted 1 grade. F – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > And they earned the Death Penalty, more than McVey should have been executed > for that. > See ya, > John

Response:

This individual has claimed "You knew exactly what I meant", so many times in various threads and then gone on to accuse another , simultaneously lambasting opponent’s integrity: "your hyperbole was dishonest, misleading at best", he gets the drooling "read my mind", Fool Award. F – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->"The Devil’s In The Details" is nothing more than a weasel attempt to >justify facism. > You are being irrational again. This is a Democracty, and a pretty well > designed one. So cut that out! > Some standardization of ID needs to happen. We need to enforce immigration > law, and we need to be able to track those that only have temporary > permission to be here. That`s what I was talking about when I said that the > Devil was in the details. You knew exactly what I meant, and your hyperbole > was dishonest, misleading at best. > See ya, > John

Response:

We had to watch patriotic educational films courtesy of the FBI at the Christian elementary school I attended 58-60 something. I have very distinct memories of J Edgar himself warning us about the dangers of communism. One of the most important features of communism other than having to share and not being allowed to pray in public, was the dreaded internal passport. Mr. Hoover warned us fifth graders that if we were taken over by Communists, we would have to carry ID at all times, we would have to ask for permission to travel from Philadelhpia to Chicago, we would have to show our IDs to go to movies, check out books, buy things. Under dreaded Communism our every move would be tracked!! We would become virtual slaves of the state. Boy Eddie, you were right! but you were wrong too.

Response:

> You are being irrational again. This is a Democracty, and a pretty well > designed one.

Astonishing, but not surprising, IGNORANCE and blindness.  As if America ever was, was supposed to be, or is at all "a democracy."  And as if the tracking, management & enslavement of citizens were some partisan finger-pointing issue wherein one "party" is more the villain than the other "party."  One wonders whether people who spout such things made it past the 3rd grade on their own academic & intellectual abilities?

Response:

> This is a Democracty, and a pretty well > designed one.

So was Germany before 1933. > So cut that out!

Oh stop! > Some standardization of ID needs to happen.

No it doesn’t. The system works just fine right now and nothing in the new law will stop a terrorist from obtaining a driver’s license. > We need to enforce immigration law

We already do quite well in that regard. There will always be illegal immigrants to this country and the country is better off with them here. They supply a renewable supply of cheap labor that this country needs. They send money back to their home countries that help them survive and the vast majority of them stay out of trouble, do their work, collect their pay and then go home.

Response:

> I was *pissed* at my last drivers license renewal. > They required *fingerprints*!!! I dunno about other > states, but that was a first for me here. Between the > photo and prints I felt personally violated; like I > was being booked, though no crime had been committed.

Blame a Republican. If you voted for one then blame yourself.

Response:

> You are being irrational again. This is a

Democracty, and a pretty > well > designed one. > Astonishing, but not surprising, IGNORANCE and blindness.  As if > America ever was, was supposed to be, or is at

all "a democracy."  And > as if the tracking, management & enslavement of citizens were some > partisan finger-pointing issue wherein one

"party" is more the villain > than the other "party."  One wonders whether

people who spout such > things made it past the 3rd grade on their own

academic & intellectual > abilities?

"Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed." the Founding Fathers

Response:

> We had to watch patriotic educational films

courtesy of the FBI at the > Christian elementary school I attended 58-60

something. I have very > distinct memories of J Edgar himself warning us

about the dangers of > communism. One of the most important features of

communism other than > having to share and not being allowed to pray in public, was the > dreaded internal passport. Mr. Hoover warned us

fifth graders that if > we were taken over by Communists, we would have to carry ID at all > times, we would have to ask for permission to

travel from Philadelhpia > to Chicago, we would have to show our IDs to go

to movies, check out > books, buy things. Under dreaded Communism our every move would be > tracked!! We would become virtual slaves of the state. > Boy Eddie, you were right! but you were wrong

too. Welcome to the New World Odor Bush Sr. was pushing on us. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin (1706 – 1790)

Response:

> > If this latest step down the road toward

fascism doesn’t scare the crap > out of you then you’re brain dead. If you

voted for a Republican in the > last election it’s your fault. > While I do have some concerns, some kind of standardization of > indentification isn`t a bad idea. As usual, the

devil`s in the details… They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin (1706 – 1790) > BTW Watch for considerable Dem support, so don`t

make it a Republican issue. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Illegal immigation is a very real problem, as 9/11 proved. > See ya, > John

Response:

Question:

>     "Fraudulent"? "Loopey"? Those are words common to atheist doctrinal > assertions. They are doctrinal for lack evidence. In fact they are mere > opinions, AKA beliefs held in faith, much like those of theists. Except the > beliefs of theists are of God, but those of atheists are of Satan. Satan is > a liar and the father of lies, and he says that neither God nor Satan exist. > Atheists believe him, theists do not. >     I would sugggest you do your trolling in atheist NGs, rather than in our > pristine, sanctified and blessed Christian NGs, for you will get no converts > here. > Pastor Frank

Firstly I would like you to tell us where your right to use the title "Pastor" was awarded.  You do not write like a qualified Baptist pastor so I assume you either got it out of a packet of cornflakes, it is a title in a looney fringe church that gives them away like electoral buttons, or it came through the post or from some weird pseudo academic foundation. There are a lot of them.  You can become a "Professor" too if you pay the bill and answer a couple of questions! Your post is barely literate so it is difficult to reply to it.  For a start however I am not an atheist – however I know of NO atheist "doctrine"  - most atheists and agnostics are free thinkers unless they are members of a second grouping such as stalinists. You also seem to confuse atheists with Satanists which suggests you are a little bit potty or at least very confused indeed.  Maybe you could go back to your "seminary" and seek re-instruction on this point – in the meantime don’t give up your day job! I just love this pile of codswallop you wrote which almost defies any analysis other than a psychiatric one: "Satan is  a liar and the father of lies, and he says that neither God nor Satan exist.  Atheists believe him, theists do not." I mean – really – do you actually think what you wrote here makes a blind bit of bleeding sense? As to your last sentence – it is amusing – if rather sad You actually don’t have any answers Fraudulent "ministers of God" and people on a "special mission" never do For shame Frank – you aren’t Pastor Frank at all You are "Frank the Fundamentalist Fraud" John 11:35

Response:

 I’ve suggested he consider > presenting himself to the nearest Catholic Bishop for an exorcism. > I suspect he’s not open to that idea. > God bless, > Stephen

If His Grace wants help holding him down…… (sigh!)

Response:

> When you get over your anger, come back. > Happy Easter. > God bless, > Stephen

 I think that will take analytical and diagnostic treatment and medication And I sincerely hope he is receptive to both from qualified medical sources

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes >  copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the > group) > >JW writes: > >Who cares?  Paul said to not get concerned about such minutia. > >Kindly explain how that could POSSIBLY matter? > >I’m sorry!! Did Paul ever meet Jesus, > Yes. He met Jesus on the road to Damascus. > No he did not – It is a fraudulent claim that may not even emanate from > Paul (a problem with ancient documents is knowing what has been added > before they are set down)  Paul’s experience was witnessed by others – > none of whom witnessed ANY appearance of Jesus.  Pauls fraudulent claim > was made to justify his loopey theology – with which the Church has been > cursed ever since.

    "Fraudulent"? "Loopey"? Those are words common to atheist doctrinal assertions. They are doctrinal for lack evidence. In fact they are mere opinions, AKA beliefs held in faith, much like those of theists. Except the beliefs of theists are of God, but those of atheists are of Satan. Satan is a liar and the father of lies, and he says that neither God nor Satan exist. Atheists believe him, theists do not.     I would sugggest you do your trolling in atheist NGs, rather than in our pristine, sanctified and blessed Christian NGs, for you will get no converts here. Pastor Frank          SATAN’S MINIONS -people who say they are Christians but do and/or justify those doing the opposite from what Christ taught.     Jesus in John 8:44: Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.     2Pt:3:3: Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts.     2Tm:3:3: Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,     Mt:7:13: Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:    Rom:3:23: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ever know Jesus, > If he spent years with the Holy Spirit, which the epistles say he did, > then he spent years with Jesus, since Jesus told us that the Holy > Spirit was His EQUAL. > Nice try but still a pile of crap! > He had as much access to the Holy Spirit (Jesus in Spirit) as the > apostles ever did, yes.  And Paul said he didn’t learn his > Christianity from any man, but from Jesus Himself. > Just as you claim you "learnt" from the worlds greatest living theologians > (I think not) – the bottom line is that Paul may have been as nutty as > you! (and as much a bully) > When you belittle Paul, you stop communicating with me. > No-one can communicate with you.  Your reception equipment is severely > defective!  You only seek an opportunity to bully your idiotic occultist > theology into people.  You ain’t no Christian in my book!  You are an > occultist > The demons in your head will do that to you! > The demons – dear boy – are occultist manifestations of your own mental > illness which you seek to use to deride and degrade others.  They are a > product of your religiosity itself a likely accompaniement to > schizophrenic tendencies > But you are losing the battle > (Your demons took your credibility away because there are NO demons) > +++++++

Response:

> When you get over your anger, come back. > Happy Easter. > God bless, > Stephen >  I think that will take analytical and diagnostic treatment and medication > And I sincerely hope he is receptive to both from qualified medical

sources That has already been suggested to him.  He also gets headaches when reading the KJV, and has personal revelations.  I’ve suggested he consider presenting himself to the nearest Catholic Bishop for an exorcism. I suspect he’s not open to that idea. God bless, Stephen — — Stephen Korsman www.theotokos.co.za/adventism http://p217.ezboard.com/ftheabyss77549frm39 IC | XC NI | KA

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes >  copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the > group) >> x-no-archive: yes >>  copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the >> group) >> >> Why do religionists deny that JESUS SAID, THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS?? >> >Hi >> >Religionists don’t.  Christians do. >> >Two good resources on the timing of the crucifixion, one from an >Adventist >> >who has influenced and been influenced by the Church of God groups, are: >> >http://english.sdaglobal.org/dnl/bacchi/books/cruxifix.pdf >> Who cares?  Paul said to not get concerned about such minutia. >> Kindly explain how that could POSSIBLY matter? >It matters because it matters to others.  If other people use this as an >excuse to show why those who keep Easter are pagan etc because they use the >wrong days to remember Jesus’ death and resurrection, we need to be able to >defend ourselves. > Since I can’t think of a single group you’d belong to that I would > want to belong to, I see no reason to help you in defending a position > I don’t see any point in defending.

They are your beliefs too, John. > You are merely one of millions who wish to question and challenge > every word of scripture that doesn’t fit your pagan beliefs, and I > won’t help you do that.

When you get over your anger, come back. Happy Easter. God bless, Stephen — — Stephen Korsman www.theotokos.co.za/adventism http://p217.ezboard.com/ftheabyss77549frm39 IC | XC NI | KA

Response:

> You have simply learned to make excuses for doing as you damn well > please, and I won’t help you sin. > jw

You being the lines greatest expert in this?

Response:

> x-no-archive: yes >  copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the > group) >JW writes: >Who cares?  Paul said to not get concerned about such minutia. >Kindly explain how that could POSSIBLY matter? >I’m sorry!! Did Paul ever meet Jesus, > Yes. He met Jesus on the road to Damascus.

No he did not – It is a fraudulent claim that may not even emanate from Paul (a problem with ancient documents is knowing what has been added before they are set down)  Paul’s experience was witnessed by others – none of whom witnessed ANY appearance of Jesus.  Pauls fraudulent claim was made to justify his loopey theology – with which the Church has been cursed ever since. > ever know Jesus, > If he spent years with the Holy Spirit, which the epistles say he did, > then he spent years with Jesus, since Jesus told us that the Holy > Spirit was His EQUAL.

Nice try but still a pile of crap! > He had as much access to the Holy Spirit (Jesus in Spirit) as the > apostles ever did, yes.  And Paul said he didn’t learn his > Christianity from any man, but from Jesus Himself.

Just as you claim you "learnt" from the worlds greatest living theologians (I think not) – the bottom line is that Paul may have been as nutty as you! (and as much a bully) > When you belittle Paul, you stop communicating with me.

No-one can communicate with you.  Your reception equipment is severely defective!  You only seek an opportunity to bully your idiotic occultist theology into people.  You ain’t no Christian in my book!  You are an occultist > The demons in your head will do that to you!

The demons – dear boy – are occultist manifestations of your own mental illness which you seek to use to deride and degrade others.  They are a product of your religiosity itself a likely accompaniement to schizophrenic tendencies But you are losing the battle (Your demons took your credibility away because there are NO demons) +++++++

Response:

JW writes:

Who cares?  Paul said to not get concerned about such minutia. Kindly explain how that could POSSIBLY matter? I’m sorry!! Did Paul ever meet Jesus, ever know Jesus, ever study with Jesus like the disciples did?? Oh, right you mean that sunstroke he suffered on the road to Damascus. Why would it possibly MATTER. If you can’t even get that straight, what else are you messing up. God tells us, not to follow the pagans. Not to enquire after how they served their gods. Read Deuteronomy 12: 30. May as well read verse 31 also, where he says not to sacrifice sons and daughters to Gods. Smile. Oh, that’s right. Paul didn’t say that. Paul must have said it was O.K. to follow the crucifixation of ATTIS did he?? Oh, right. Paul said it didn’t matter. Smile.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> x-no-archive: yes >  copyright 2005 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the > group) >> Why do religionists deny that JESUS SAID, THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS?? >Hi >Religionists don’t.  Christians do. >Two good resources on the timing of the crucifixion, one from an Adventist >who has influenced and been influenced by the Church of God groups, are: >http://english.sdaglobal.org/dnl/bacchi/books/cruxifix.pdf > Who cares?  Paul said to not get concerned about such minutia. > Kindly explain how that could POSSIBLY matter?

It matters because it matters to others.  If other people use this as an excuse to show why those who keep Easter are pagan etc because they use the wrong days to remember Jesus’ death and resurrection, we need to be able to defend ourselves. God bless, Stephen — — Stephen Korsman www.theotokos.co.za/adventism http://p217.ezboard.com/ftheabyss77549frm39 IC | XC NI | KA

Response:

> Thursday of Crucifixation week started at dusk on Wednesday night. > It was the Feast of Unleaven Bread, a Jewish High Sabbath day.

So lets see if I’ve got this right… it was the sabbath on a thursday which was really wednesday anyway? No wonder the middle east is fucked up. dogger

Response:

Dogger writes:

So lets see if I’ve got this right… it was the sabbath on a thursday which was really wednesday anyway? No wonder the middle east is fucked up. It is obvious that the concepts are a little over your head. Don’t be afraid to ask for help when you don’t understand something. But put your hand up first. That’s it, pretend you are in school. Now ask for help. Say Teacher I don’t understand.

Response:

> Why do religionists deny that JESUS SAID, THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS??

Hi Religionists don’t.  Christians do. Two good resources on the timing of the crucifixion, one from an Adventist who has influenced and been influenced by the Church of God groups, are: http://english.sdaglobal.org/dnl/bacchi/books/cruxifix.pdf http://www.bible.ca/d-3-days-and-3-nights.htm They explain the issue quite well. God bless, Stephen — — Stephen Korsman www.theotokos.co.za/adventism http://p217.ezboard.com/ftheabyss77549frm39 IC | XC NI | KA

Response:

Thursday of Crucifixation week started at dusk on Wednesday night. It was the Feast of Unleaven Bread, a Jewish High Sabbath day. John mentions this high day in Chapter 19: 31 – The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day, (for that sabbath day was an high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. Peter in his Gospel is more explicit – [3] But Joseph, the friend of Pilate and of the Lord, had been standing there; and knowing they were about to crucify him, he came before Pilate and requested the body of the Lord for burial. [4] And Pilate, having sent to Herod, requested his body. [5] And Herod said: ‘Brother Pilate, even if no one had requested him, we would have buried him, since indeed Sabbath is dawning. For in the Law it has been written: The sun is not to set on one put to death.’ And he gave him over to the people before the first day of their feast of the Unleavened Bread. As John mentions that the Sabbath, was a HIGH day. Peter tells us that The HIGH day was the first day of their Feast of the Unleavened Bread. Jesus himself tells us that he would be in the grave for THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS. Crucified on Wednesday, the PASSOVER – Thus he is called the PASSOVER LAMB. Wednesday night, Thursday day – One day Thursday night, Friday day – Second day Friday night, Saturday day – Third day. As Jesus himself said, THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS. He arose Saturday night, after dark. THUS. John 20: 1 – The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre. NOTE, WHEN IT WAS YET DARK. It was still dark, and Jesus was gone. Why is that religionists, celebrate BLACK FRIDAY when Attis was hung on a tree, and THE PAGAN DAY OF THE SUN, when Attis arose. Why do religionists deny that JESUS SAID, THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS??

Response:

Question:

> ALL sexual activity outside marriage is SIN.

So… ranching is an insult to your wussy God, right? Do salmon have to marry – even though they don’t actually come in contact with each other? Are the sex organs of plants considered sexual for your purposes? Can God make a Christian so offensive that even God cannot love him?

Response:

[snips] > Based on our modern scientific knowledge of genetics, please tell me how > do you get a viable breeding pool with genetic diversity when you start > out with on one male [Adam] and one female [Eve] of a species?

Actually, it might explain everything. God know, evangelical "Christians" certainly think and behave like inbred idiots.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >>God’s intentions of normal manhood. > Maybe they should start with priests that fuck young boys instead of > worrying about two homo adults do.. > ALL sexual activity outside marriage is SIN.  Needless to say, marriage > is NOT two men in "love."  God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

Perhaps the Christia Extremist Right could come up with a new cliche’ catchphrase? > The sins of the Catholic Church are proof that the institution is > demonic,

So I suppose the fall fo a number of evangelical leaders stands as proof that right wing evangelicalism is daemonic as well speck-log-eye-neighbor-own Familiar concepts, MR. Criswell? (I have a real doctorate and 2 post doc fellowships) > Dr. James Slaughter, Professor of Creation "Science?" > Criswell Bible Institute,  Dallas, Texas > www.criswell.edu > Listen to our 100,000 watt radio station on 90.9 FM in Texas > or online at www.kcbi.org

– "Woman’s Need calls me as Woman’s Need made me. Her Need I will answer as my maker bade me." Lady Kethryveris

Response:

> ALL sexual activity outside marriage is > SIN.  *** God made Adam and Eve . . . .

when and where were Adam and Eve married?

Response:

>>>Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >>God’s intentions of normal manhood. >Maybe they should start with priests that fuck young boys instead of >worrying about two homo adults do.. > ALL sexual activity outside marriage is SIN.  Needless to say, marriage > is NOT two men in "love."  God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.

        Well since you seem to be such an expert on the Bible, perhaps you can explain something to me.         Based on our modern scientific knowledge of genetics, please tell me how do you get a viable breeding pool with genetic diversity when you start out with on one male [Adam] and one female [Eve] of a species? And further, how do you breed that viable genetic pool without incest [which we know is a sin] when you start with only one male and one female? <snip> —       This represents my personal opinion and NOT Company policy   Goderich, Ont, Canada. To reply, post a request for my valid E-mail         "Life is a sexually transmitted, terminal, condition"

Response:

> What, pray tell, do the graduates do? > I shudder to think about a graduation ceremony. White capes and pointy > white caps?

Close – funeral smocks and mock-drownings. Then they renounce mankind, and dedicate themselves to sending folks to their wild version of an "afterlife".

Response:

>>Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >God’s intentions of normal manhood. > Maybe they should start with priests that fuck young boys instead of > worrying about two homo adults do..

ALL sexual activity outside marriage is SIN.  Needless to say, marriage is NOT two men in "love."  God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. The sins of the Catholic Church are proof that the institution is demonic, with its proliferation of homosexual priests and worship of Mary. — Dr. James Slaughter, Professor of Creation Science Criswell Bible Institute,  Dallas, Texas www.criswell.edu Listen to our 100,000 watt radio station on 90.9 FM in Texas or online at www.kcbi.org

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >>> God’s intentions of normal manhood. >>I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can >>not >>believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified for an >>FCC license. > Kind of a sad story, actually: > http://www.mindspring.com/~sartor/gradyhs/knon.html > Very sad. Another formulaic religious fire and brimstone purveyor replaces > what seems like a unique station.

The US needs MORE of them. Maybe more gays can be helped.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >> God’s intentions of normal manhood. >I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can >not >believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified for an >FCC license. > Kind of a sad story, actually: > http://www.mindspring.com/~sartor/gradyhs/knon.html

Very sad. Another formulaic religious fire and brimstone purveyor replaces what seems like a unique station.

Response:

>> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to >> God’s intentions of normal manhood. > It’s not a *real* school.

Whew. When one of the associate professors can’t even write correct English, I was worrid. > It’s like a beauty school or one of those vocational things for people who > aren’t all that smartificated.

What, pray tell, do the graduates do? I shudder to think about a graduation ceremony. White capes and pointy white caps? > I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can > not believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified > for an FCC license. > Ever watch to the Trinity network or CBN?

Yes, but my need to power vomit cut short those experiences.

Response:

> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to > God’s intentions of normal manhood.

It’s not a *real* school. It’s like a beauty school or one of those vocational things for people who aren’t all that smartificated. > I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can > not believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified for > an FCC license.

Ever watch to the Trinity network or CBN?

Response:

>> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to > God’s intentions of normal manhood. >I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can not >believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified for an >FCC license.

Kind of a sad story, actually: http://www.mindspring.com/~sartor/gradyhs/knon.html

Response:

> Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to > God’s intentions of normal manhood.

I can not believe you are on the faculty of a university. Further, I can not believe that an entity that spews such hatred could have qualified for an FCC license.

Response:

Dr. James Slaughter, Professor of Creation Science Criswell Bible Institute,  Dallas, Texas www.criswell.edu Dr. Slaughter, I visited the website for Criswell Bible Institute–where you list yourself as Professor of Creation Science–to get an idea of the course of study one might pursue for a degree in Creation Science. I did see a single course in Natural Science.  Unfortunately, there was no course description so I have no idea what might be conveyed to students in this course. What puzzles me most, however, is the complete absence of training in chemistry, physics, biology, geology, paleontology or even mathematics. Where did you attain your own knowledge in these sciences to qualify yourself as a professor of Creation Science?

Response:

> Organization: Criswell Biblical Institute > Here are some organization that can help restore homosexuals to > God’s intentions of normal manhood.

The arrogant assumption of the Fundie Christians that homosexuals can be "restored" to God’s intentions of normal manhood is flawed from many viewpoints. * it assumes that homosexuals were once heterosexuals, an assumption that has never been shown by anyone. * It assumes that homosexuality is a learned trait, which can be unlearned, like going on a diet or stopping smoking.  There is no evidence for that assumption either. * It arrogantly assumes that "God’s intention"  was for "normal manhood", whatever that means.  It also assumes that the promoter of this thesis speaks for God, and knows all his intentions. So, I ask: If homosexuality is not part of God’s intention,why does he nt only permit it, but allow it to exist for thousands of years? Also, why to some species of animals have homosexual minorities?

Response:

Controversy, Not Credibility A study of "gay change" with the results media were looking for By Jennifer L. Pozner Thousands of scientific studies are conducted every year, but only a fraction of these ever see newsprint. Even fewer dominate the news cycle for weeks, transform researchers into culture war commentators and move the public debate. At the American Psychiatric Association’s annual meeting on May 9, two unpublished, non-peer-reviewed studies offered opposing reports about the effectiveness and potential safety risks of "reparative therapy" to "convert" lesbians and gay men to heterosexuality, a practice long-denounced as unethical and futile by the APA and most mental health professionals. For one presentation, titled "200 Subjects Who Claim to Have Changed Their Sexual Orientation from Homosexual to Heterosexual," Columbia professor Robert Spitzer interviewed people who said they had successfully undergone conversion therapy, and reported that 66 percent of these men and 44 percent of the women had indeed achieved "good heterosexual functioning." Spitzer was involved in the APA’s 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. Spitzer said the majority of his subjects were "highly motivated" to change, understandable since they were referred to him primarily by religious right "ex-gay ministries" like Exodus International, who only offered him people they saw as success stories. Of Spitzer’s subjects, only 42 percent of men and 46 percent of women rated themselves as "exclusively homosexual" before they sought therapy to diminish gay feelings. While some might therefore refer to the majority of the subjects as bisexual rather than gay, Spitzer told Extra! he did not include a category for bisexuality in his study "because there’s no accepted definition of what bisexuality is." After therapy, conducted prior to the study, 54 percent of Spitzer’s female subjects and just 17 percent of men rated themselves as "exclusively heterosexual"–a remarkably low rate for a sample of possibly bisexual people self-selected for believing they had changed from gay to straight. Another presentation, by New York psychotherapists Ariel Shidlo and Michael Schroeder, stood in stark contrast: Of 202 randomly recruited subjects who had tried to change their sexual orientation through therapy, 88 percent failed completely, while 9 percent considered themselves successful but were celibate or still struggling with same-sex behavioral "slips"; only six people (3 percent) were actually successful. Additionally, Shidlo and Schroeder found that a great number of their subjects suffered "significant harm" due to instances in which reparative therapists appeared "not to be practicing in a manner consistent with the APA Ethics Code"–encouraging patients to remember childhood abuse as the "cause" of their homosexuality when no such abuse occurred; insisting that lesbians and gays can never live happy, healthy or monogamous lives; or practicing coercion (for example, students at religious universities were sometimes required to attend conversion therapy in order to graduate or receive financial aid). Guess which study got journalistic top-billing and which was given short-shrift? "Smoldering controversy" The day before the APA conference, an Associated Press (5/8/01) story included a provocative lead–"An explosive new study says some highly motivated gay people can turn straight"–but failed to mention that research to be presented at the same symposium suggested the opposite. One outlet after another raced to report Spitzer’s contention that "some people can change from gay to straight, and we ought to acknowledge that." (CBS Radio, 5/9/01)–usually alongside sharp responses from activists like the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force’s David Elliot, who called the study "snake oil, not science" (New York Times, 5/9/01). Outlets stoked a ratings-grabbing "smoldering controversy" (New Orleans Times-Picayune, 5/10/01) with sensationalized language about the likelihood of gays "switching sides" (Time, 5/21/01) "if they really want to" (AP, 5/8/01). "I hope you’re bracing yourself," a CNN interviewer told Spitzer the day he presented his study (5/9/01), "because already it is the buzz of our newsroom." A typical front-page Boston Herald story (5/9/01) framed the study as "reigniting the fiery debate about whether a ‘cure’ exists for homosexuality." Though some reporters discussed the gay change theory in terms of pathology ("Gays Have Mental Illness and Can Be Cured, Doctor Says," London Daily Telegraph, 5/10/01), many outlets were suitably skeptical, noting that Spitzer’s peers dismissed the study as "lacking in scientific rigor" because "there was no control group, no physiological testing or evidence of long-term success" (San Francisco Chronicle, 5/13/01). Time’s Jeffrey Kluger (5/21/01) called Spitzer’s sample biased and his standards "decidedly subjective." Yet aside from one excellent, in-depth interview buried on Newsweek’s website (5/10/01), the most relevant criticism, the Shidlo/Schroeder study directly contesting the efficacy and safety of reparative therapy, was generally ignored or mentioned only in passing, without quoting–or sometimes even naming–the researchers. "Very few reporters asked" for a copy of the study, Shidlo told Extra!; when he offered to send one, "they seemed uninterested." Even stories that seemed to promise a balanced investigation of both APA presentations failed to make good: A Washington Post (5/9/01) article headlined "Studies on Gays Yield Conflicting Findings" gave only one of 18 paragraphs to the Shidlo/Schroeder study. "We have good reason to suspect, based on our data, that many, many people suffer terribly through the [conversion therapy] process," Shidlo told Extra!. "Would we approve a medicine that helped, say 5 out of a hundred people, but severely hurt 35 of the 100, and didn’t help at all the rest? This is a point that the media ignored." "Should all gays try it?" While news reports wondered "Can gays go straight?" (Seattle Times, 5/9/01), conservative writers presented this as a given, in columns headlined "Gays Can Go Straight" (Denver Post, 5/13/01; National Review Online, 5/14/01). Others used Spitzer’s research to justify anti-gay political activism; in a Baltimore Sun op- ed (6/26/01), Allan Medinger, past president of the ex-gay ministry Exodus International, hoped that public acceptance of "homosexuality as a behavioral choice and not an identity" would "enable Christians

Question:

>The christian fundamentalist movement in the USA has declared that the >Washington Monument is a phallic symbol for homosexuals and as such, >must be sheated in cloth to hide its features from public view.

So, just to recap: The same people who think birth control is eeeeevil now want to put a condom on a 55 story representation of the male organ…. in PUBLIC, no less? Now I know these assloaves don’t have a mind to make up! Belated Happy MLK,Jr.Day — Bonnie Bitch

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model. > Fundamentalist Christians could find something about an orgasm to complain > about.

Well, not if it’s achieved within the context of a marriage certified by an ordained minister . . . and it occurred during the act of intended for procreation. — Alric Knebel http://www.ironeyefortress.com/C-SPAN_loon.html

Response:

A controversial website is under attack by the feds for its content. Cryptome is operated by John Young, a 69 year old architec from Texas who now lives in NYNY. For years, John has published every document sent to him with the promise that nothing would be taken off his site without a court order.  Thus, John is a true American who stands firmly behind the US Constitution.  He exercises his right to free speech, but promises that he will abide by any court ruiling to remove a document.  Yet, this is not good enough.   The US Federal government is on the attack.  Just a couple of days ago, Johns site was said to have been "taken down", a new phrase for the times we live in, by the feds.  But why would the feds force the shutdown of Cryptome when John clearly states that he will abide by any court order to remove a document? The answer to that question is bothersome, but simple: The feds do not have to get a court order to shut down a site, but limiting the free speech of an American is much more difficult using the courts, as it should be.  Therefore, rather than take John to court to request that a certain document be removed, BIG BROTHER was said to have decided to "take down" Johns site. So whats the problem here?  An extensive article HERE <http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/jan05.asp> states that John has no banned, or top secret articles given him and posted on his page.  No, all that John has done is post a "sensitive" item that was sent to him.  The truth may be that John Young is more American than those who are attacking him.  The attackers are using schemes rather than law to go censor an American citizen.  It may very well be that the "feds" have waited in the wings for John to post a document that they didn’t like so that  he could be "taken down".  So much for due process of the law, and for First Amendment rights of American citizens. Big Brother hates real free speech, and here is an article that explains why :  Big Brother Hates Free Speech. <http://tracey5190.tripod.com/> If America were founded today, you would never be allowed all the liberty laid out in our wonderful Consitution. Clearly, some in washington think Americans are too free,  and in less than a week after President George W. Bush talks about helping nations around the globe to achieve liberty and freedom, his own administration attacks an AMERICAN because they dont like what he’s posted on his website. Are we turly free, or are you free as long as your existance doesn’t upset someone in our government? Will the God hating radicals over at the ACLU come running on this one?

Response:

This just in: The christian fundamentalist movement in the USA has declared that the Washington Monument is a phallic symbol for homosexuals and as such, must be sheated in cloth to hide its features from public view.  Similar treatment is required for the Seattle Needle, and the Bush regime is urged to put pressure on canada to sheath its obervation towers on the canadian side of the Niagara Falls site since those pornographic phallic symbols are visible from the USA. "Family values are very important to americans and we must pursue whatever it takes to preserve them and prevent western decadence from destroyaing our morality". In a related news story, there is now strong speculation that it was the christian fundamentalists who hired Ossama Bin laden to destroy the twin towers since they obviously portayed homosexuality, with two long hard erect penis next to each other". Some say that this was jealousy since the fundamentalists felt rather inadequate compared to the size of the towers. There is widespread agreement, even amongst the most victorian of the christian fundamentalist movement that the right to air Victoria’s Secret ads on TV at any time of the day should be enshrined into the USA constitution. "While any display of the female or male body is unacceptable in public, watching Victoria’s Secret commercials while in the privacy of your own home or office is healthy education for all males, especially senators or congressman for whom watching those commercials may avoid the need to hire hookers and cheat on their wives.

Response:

female alter egos, porned: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->This just in: >The christian fundamentalist movement in the USA has declared that the >Washington Monument is a phallic symbol for homosexuals and as such, >must be sheated in cloth to hide its features from public view.  Similar >treatment is required for the Seattle Needle, and the Bush regime is >urged to put pressure on canada to sheath its obervation towers on the >canadian side of the Niagara Falls site since those pornographic phallic >symbols are visible from the USA. >"Family values are very important to americans and we must pursue >whatever it takes to preserve them and prevent western decadence from >destroyaing our morality". >In a related news story, there is now strong speculation that it was the >christian fundamentalists who hired Ossama Bin laden to destroy the twin >towers since they obviously portayed homosexuality, with two long hard >erect penis next to each other". Some say that this was jealousy since >the fundamentalists felt rather inadequate compared to the size of the towers. >There is widespread agreement, even amongst the most victorian of the >christian fundamentalist movement that the right to air Victoria’s >Secret ads on TV at any time of the day should be enshrined into the USA >constitution. "While any display of the female or male body is >unacceptable in public, watching Victoria’s Secret commercials while in >the privacy of your own home or office is healthy education for all >males, especially senators or congressman for whom watching those >commercials may avoid the need to hire hookers and cheat on their wives.

Interesting piece of pornographic writing there, JF. Why do you spend so much time obsessing about the sex lives of Americans? Is your sex life with your mom leaving you hungry for more?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> This just in: >  The christian fundamentalist movement in the USA has declared that the > Washington Monument is a phallic symbol for homosexuals and as such, > must be sheated in cloth to hide its features from public view.  Similar > treatment is required for the Seattle Needle, and the Bush regime is > urged to put pressure on canada to sheath its obervation towers on the > canadian side of the Niagara Falls site since those pornographic phallic > symbols are visible from the USA. > "Family values are very important to americans and we must pursue > whatever it takes to preserve them and prevent western decadence from > destroyaing our morality". > In a related news story, there is now strong speculation that it was the > christian fundamentalists who hired Ossama Bin laden to destroy the twin > towers since they obviously portayed homosexuality, with two long hard > erect penis next to each other". Some say that this was jealousy since > the fundamentalists felt rather inadequate compared to the size of the towers. > There is widespread agreement, even amongst the most victorian of the > christian fundamentalist movement that the right to air Victoria’s > Secret ads on TV at any time of the day should be enshrined into the USA > constitution. "While any display of the female or male body is > unacceptable in public, watching Victoria’s Secret commercials while in > the privacy of your own home or office is healthy education for all > males, especially senators or congressman for whom watching those > commercials may avoid the need to hire hookers and cheat on their wives.

LOL, reminds me of "sex is evil, it could lead onto something worse, like dancing!" ;-) Matty

Response:

>| alt.atheism: >| >| >As if little Johnny is going to be gay because of some subliminal >| >message he got watching cartoons when he was four. Are these fundies >| >claiming that the influence of dad, the pastor, and all the guys at the >| >fish-n-bait shop are out-influenced by one imaginary sponge? >| >| This is the same mindset that will tell you that the majority of >| people in the world believe in the Christian god, but that Christians >| are a persecuted minority.

I wonder if they wear neckbraces to stop their tiny heads from spinning?

Response:

said in alt.atheism: >Just one question…is SpongeBob a ‘top’ or a ‘bottom’?

Who says he’s in the lifestyle? — "If anyone comes to me, and does not hate his father, mother, wife, brothers, and sisters and even himself, he cannot be my disciple." Luke 14:26 (random sig, produced by SigChanger) rukbat at verizon dot net

Response:

>> "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. >Here’s a man who can see the inner gay beneath all cartoon surfaces. >How  could one possibly  parody this? >As for Jerry "The Twink" Falwell… the man has issues. >As if little Johnny is going to be gay because of some subliminal >message he got watching cartoons when he was four. Are these fundies >claiming that the influence of dad, the pastor, and all the guys at the >fish-n-bait shop are out-influenced by one imaginary sponge?

Yes.  ’Faith’ is so fragile. >Kermit

– Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale. Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme Court who  will ensure church and state are joined at the hip like clergy and altar boys. America 1776-Jan 2001  RIP

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Gay says… > Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > Just one question…is SpongeBob a ‘top’ or a ‘bottom’? > FB

He’s a sponge, with a lot of holes in him…  he can be pretty much anything. — "Only Buddhism is compatible with science. It covers the smallest particles to the largest creations of the cosmos.  It is the only religion capable of scientific truth." Albert Einstein

Response:

>Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video >Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ >LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups >accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney >and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to >children.

Just one question…is SpongeBob a ‘top’ or a ‘bottom’? FB

Response:

> Bob the Builder is gay too???

Duh! :) > Well, I always thought his jeans were a little too tight.  I was just > hoping my son wouldn’t notice and start asking questions.

– Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557

Response:

> It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model.

As if any self-respecting purple gay man would carry a red handbag!

Response:

alt.atheism: >As if little Johnny is going to be gay because of some subliminal >message he got watching cartoons when he was four. Are these fundies >claiming that the influence of dad, the pastor, and all the guys at the >fish-n-bait shop are out-influenced by one imaginary sponge?

This is the same mindset that will tell you that the majority of people in the world believe in the Christian god, but that Christians are a persecuted minority. — "Damn. Looks like all of usenet agrees that you don’t have the logical faculties to prove the statement ‘dogshit is not peanut butter’ if we gave you a jar of each and a box of crackers" – John Hattan to Tichy (random sig, produced by SigChanger) rukbat at verizon dot net

Response:

These people need to get a grip and worry about their own issues. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model.

Good grief. A few weeks ago Sam Seder (sp?) from Majority Report (AAR) phoned a similar organization after hearing this and  proposed that "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer" promotes a gay agenda. Hey! The man he was speaking to agreed. Cheers, Morgs MPGS http://home.earthlink.net/~nomo1521/

Response:

> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children.

C’mon now…. Saying Spongebob is gay is like saying Bugs Bunny is gay. Now we ALL knew Tinky Winky was queer from the start.  In fact, my 3-year-old’s gaydar went off almost immediately.  He woke me up one night and whispered, "Daddy… I fink Tinky Winky is a fag."  Then he went back to bed. My son is 8 now and I trust his perceptiveness.  Trust me (and him)… Spongebob is not gay, nor is Patrick.  Squidward?  We’re not sure about him, but Sandy IS a lesbo, that we’re sure of. Steve

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > http://www.tabletnewspaper.com/vol2iss_19/lit/comiccavalcade.htm > Kweers in Comics > by Justin L. Haines > For a long time, queers had no representation in mainstream comics only > allusions and allegories. > Actually in the 1954, Batman was outted as the first queer in comics, at > least from the perspective of Dr. Fredric Wertham. The elder psychiatrist > launched a campaign against comics that in true McCarthy style ended up in > congressional hearings. These hearings nearly destroyed the comic industry > as sales plummeted. The few publishers that survived the attacks were forced > into self-regulation through the adoption of the Comic Code Authority > (comics to this day still bear the code’s seal of approval). Most of > Wertham’s attacks focused on the fact that young people would emulate the > crimes they saw being committed in the comics. > In Wertham’s book Seduction of the Innocent he made a special attack on > Batman. Wertham devoted four pages to pointing out that Batman and Robin > were gay and this would influence other young boys to take the same path to > damnation. "They live in sumptuous quarters, with beautiful flowers in large > vases, and have a butler. It is like a wish dream of two homosexuals living > together. The Batman type of story may stimulate children to homosexual > fantasies." Wertham’s claims were based on his experience working with > queers at his clinic who sometimes fantasized switching places with Batman > and his all male household. Please, most queers would have imagined a cute > houseboy not some old troll butler like Alfred! > In the next decade, Batman’s writers, artists, and publisher would try and > prove Batman’s heterosexuality. The most obvious responses was to create new > female Bat characters to complete the family set. There was a Batwoman, a > blond Batgirl, and the round out the family, a Bat-dog! There was no > mistaking Batwoman was in fact a woman since instead of a utility belt she > carried a Bat-purse filled with useful crime fighting devices like lipstick > cases filled with tear gas and a compact filled with sneezing powder. > Storylines were not unlike situational comedies with the most memorable > being the marriage of Batman and Batwoman, a scenario which turned out to be > a dream that Robin had. Any shred of mistaken queerness was banished for > another 15-20 years.

What about Dr. Quest and Race Bannen?  I think they had something going on.  Where was Jonny’s mother?  As far as we know, Jonny and Hadji were rent boys.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model. > Fundamentalist Christians could find something about an orgasm to complain > about.

Fundies don’t have orgasms (at least that they admit to). — John Hachmann aa #1782 Intelligent Design has as much to do with science as reality television has to do with reality. – Barry Lynn on CNN 12/25/04

Response:

> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children.

http://www.tabletnewspaper.com/vol2iss_19/lit/comiccavalcade.htm Kweers in Comics by Justin L. Haines For a long time, queers had no representation in mainstream comics only allusions and allegories. Actually in the 1954, Batman was outted as the first queer in comics, at least from the perspective of Dr. Fredric Wertham. The elder psychiatrist launched a campaign against comics that in true McCarthy style ended up in congressional hearings. These hearings nearly destroyed the comic industry as sales plummeted. The few publishers that survived the attacks were forced into self-regulation through the adoption of the Comic Code Authority (comics to this day still bear the code’s seal of approval). Most of Wertham’s attacks focused on the fact that young people would emulate the crimes they saw being committed in the comics. In Wertham’s book Seduction of the Innocent he made a special attack on Batman. Wertham devoted four pages to pointing out that Batman and Robin were gay and this would influence other young boys to take the same path to damnation. "They live in sumptuous quarters, with beautiful flowers in large vases, and have a butler. It is like a wish dream of two homosexuals living together. The Batman type of story may stimulate children to homosexual fantasies." Wertham’s claims were based on his experience working with queers at his clinic who sometimes fantasized switching places with Batman and his all male household. Please, most queers would have imagined a cute houseboy not some old troll butler like Alfred! In the next decade, Batman’s writers, artists, and publisher would try and prove Batman’s heterosexuality. The most obvious responses was to create new female Bat characters to complete the family set. There was a Batwoman, a blond Batgirl, and the round out the family, a Bat-dog! There was no mistaking Batwoman was in fact a woman since instead of a utility belt she carried a Bat-purse filled with useful crime fighting devices like lipstick cases filled with tear gas and a compact filled with sneezing powder. Storylines were not unlike situational comedies with the most memorable being the marriage of Batman and Batwoman, a scenario which turned out to be a dream that Robin had. Any shred of mistaken queerness was banished for another 15-20 years. In the 1980’s, queers still hadn’t made it out of the closet, but we had the next best thing, the X-men. While none of the X-men actually queer but they mutants as a whole acted as a metaphor for queers. Let’s go through the laundry list of mutant queer/connections: 1. Mutants were stigmatized, hated, and feared by the general populace just for being born different 2. They developed the "powers" at puberty when they were forced to accept their status as mutants 3. Mutants were safest amongst their own kind and often sought out such living arrangements like at Professor X’s mansion or in the "underground scene" of New York’s Morlock separatists. 4. Mutants suffer from the Legacy Virus, a deadly virus that targets mutants specifically and slowly causes them to have skin disfigurement (like KS lesions) and to waste away (not unlike AIDS) 5. It was important for many storylines that the mutants keep their identities and true natures a secret in the mutant closet 6. The occasionally were the targets for mutant bashing and Professor X was once beaten so badly he had to be hospitalized after an attack by some kids that he was teaching at the community college. The first truly queer mutant came out in the early 1990’s when Northstar of Alpha Flight burst out of the closet. Northstar has maintained his queerness to this day as he just appeared in the current X-men titles and joked about it with his uptight and homophobic teammate from Brooklyn. Queers are almost to the point of being normalized in mainstream comics. In the latest stack of 20 or so comic titles I just brought home, five of the titles had primary or supporting queer characters. Wonder Woman’s highly praised new artist/writer Phil Himenez is openly gay and is noted as having brought new life to the 60 year old heroine in articles appearing in the Washington Post and New York Times. In her latest issue, Wonder Woman was doing some volunteering for AIDS work with her ex-managers queer brother. Green Arrow, whose comic is a number one seller consistently, live with an older queer benefactor who pulled his homeless ass of the street. There have even been queer lead characters in Young Heroes in Love, Starman, Top Ten, Alpha Flight, and Legion of Super Heroes. The best queer couple, who even won a GLAAD award for positive representation of queers was Apollo and Midnighter from DC/Wildstorm’s the Authority. The Authority is a team not unlike the Justice League with Apollo being modeled after Superman and Midnighter being modeled after Batman. They kick major ass and one storyline had Midnighter exacting some revenge on a super-baddie who beat up his boyfriend. Midnighter whipped out a device that looked like a bazooka crossed with a dildo with the implied intention of blasting the bad-guy’s ass to kingdom come. We have come a long way since the 1950’s closet Batman. Comic as with most mediums mirror the times. As queers are regular fixtures on Must-See TV, queers are filling our comic book imaginations and are more than victims. While we will never see Batman and Superman waking up in bed together, we have our own Apollo and Midnighter.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model.

Please don’t paint all Christians with the same brush. I’m not sure why they would be called Christians, other than their own Orwellian use of the term. Homophobia and other hate crimes derive from fears that have absolutely nothing in common with the teaching of Christ or the example of His life. There’s not one word in any of the four Gospels where Christ or his disciples discuss or disparage homosexuality. In fact, Christ expressed a life-philosophy of universal love and tolerance and forgave those who murdered him upon the cross. Most of today’s Christians understand this, and only a handful of radicals misanthropes who mistakenly call themselves Christians look for evil under every rock and flower. If Christ were alive today, these are the very folks who would demand his crucifiction. — ipgrunt

Response:

> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children.

Don’t blame all Christians for the actions of a few ultra-conservative fundamentalist morons! — Rick Visit the Entropy Productions homepage at http://www.kringlecityconspiracy.com/entropy.htm

Response:

Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to children. The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to encourage tolerance and diversity. But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of homosexuality. "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article for the American Family Association. The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and race. "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a statement released Thursday. Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at dinner this week in Washington, D.C. SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the characters in the show as asexual. It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as a gay role model.

Response:

> "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association.

Here’s a man who can see the inner gay beneath all cartoon surfaces. How  could one possibly  parody this? As for Jerry "The Twink" Falwell… the man has issues. As if little Johnny is going to be gay because of some subliminal message he got watching cartoons when he was four. Are these fundies claiming that the influence of dad, the pastor, and all the guys at the fish-n-bait shop are out-influenced by one imaginary sponge? Kermit

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Christians issue gay warning on SpongeBob video > Conservative groups criticize maker’s ‘tolerance pledge’ > LOS ANGELES, California (Reuters) — Conservative Christian groups > accuse the makers of a video starring SpongeBob SquarePants, Barney > and a host of other cartoon characters of promoting homosexuality to > children. > The wacky square yellow SpongeBob is one of the stars of a music video > due to be sent to 61,000 U.S. schools in March. The makers — the > nonprofit We Are Family Foundation — say the video is designed to > encourage tolerance and diversity. > But at least two Christian activist groups say the innocent cartoon > characters are being exploited to promote the acceptance of > homosexuality. > "A short step beneath the surface reveals that one of the differences > being celebrated is homosexuality," wrote Ed Vitagliano in an article > for the American Family Association. > The video is a remake of the 1979 hit song "We Are Family" using the > voices and images of SpongeBob, Barney, Winnie the Pooh, Bob the > Builder, the Rugrats and other TV cartoon characters. It was made by a > foundation set up by songwriter Nile Rodgers after the terrorist > attacks of September 11, 2001, in an effort to promote healing. > Christian groups however have taken exception to the tolerance pledge > on the foundation’s Web site, which asks people to respect the sexual > identity of others along with their abilities, beliefs, culture and > race. > "Their inclusion of the reference to ’sexual identity" within their > ‘tolerance pledge’ is not only unnecessary, but it crosses a moral > line," James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, said in a > statement released Thursday. > Rodgers said he was astounded by the attack. > "That is so myopic and harsh," he told Reuters. "You have really got > to look hard to find anything in this that is offensive to anyone. The > last thing I am going to do is taint these characters." > Dobson was quoted by the New York Times on Thursday as having singled > out the wildly popular SpongeBob during remarks about the video at > dinner this week in Washington, D.C. > SpongeBob, who lives in a pineapple under the sea, was "outed" by the > U.S. media in 2002 after reports that the TV show and its merchandise > are popular with gays. His creator, Stephen Hillenburg, said at the > time that though SpongeBob was an oddball, he thought of all the > characters in the show as asexual. > It is not the first time that children’s TV favorites have come under > the critical spotlight of the Christian right. In 1999, the Rev. Jerry > Falwell described Tinky Winky, the purse-toting purple Teletubbie, as > a gay role model.

Fundamentalist Christians could find something about an orgasm to complain about. — "Shake says that books are from the devil, and that TV is twice as fast" – Meatwad "The Constitution was written on reefer by dudes with wooden teeth" – OG Loc aa #2133 ap #19

Response: