Question:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company > which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea > – a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been > targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build > nuclear weapons. > The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here > www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. > Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected > to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created > the mess in with the DPRK. > Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck > before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped > create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. > Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for > the axis of evil, before he voted against it.
we belong to the axis of greed.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company >which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea >- a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been >targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build >nuclear weapons. >The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here >www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. >Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected >to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created >the mess in with the DPRK. >Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck >before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped >create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. >Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for >the axis of evil, before he voted against it. > we belong to the axis of greed.
Brilliant. The Axis of Arrogance, too
mvm
Response:
That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can be decades old. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company > which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea > – a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been > targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build > nuclear weapons. > The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here > www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. > Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected > to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created > the mess in with the DPRK. > Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck > before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped > create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. > Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for > the axis of evil, before he voted against it.
Response:
> That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK > now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad > stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid > else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can > be decades old.
"Capiche" this bitch writes. Earlier, he was leg-humping England. RumsFELD is an old hack dating back to Nixon. Clock’s tickin, chicken.
Response:
McNamara aint Greek or Roman
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->That was then; this is now. > Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I > don’t think so. > The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary > of defense in recent memory… >Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >be decades old. >>Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company >>which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea >>- a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been >>targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build >>nuclear weapons. >>The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here >>www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. >>Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected >>to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created >>the mess in with the DPRK. >>Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck >>before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped >>create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. >>Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for >>the axis of evil, before he voted against it.
Response:
> >That was then; this is now. > Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I > don’t think so. > The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary > of defense in recent memory…
Why are you so homo-phobic???? Gays have rights, too, but that’s always been the way of the left – pretend you are for somebody and as soon as push comes to shove, you back off. Didn’t you libs learn anything from Brokeback Mountain? In the future, please don’t hide your gay-bashing behind a faux attack on Rumsfeld! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >be decades old. >> Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company >> which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea >> – a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been >> targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build >> nuclear weapons. >> The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here >> www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. >> Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected >> to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created >> the mess in with the DPRK. >> Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck >> before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped >> create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. >> Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for >> the axis of evil, before he voted against it.
Response:
> McNamara aint Greek or Roman
More gay-bashing from the left as usual. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>That was then; this is now. > Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I > don’t think so. > The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary > of defense in recent memory… >>Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >>now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >>stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >>else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >>be decades old. >>>Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company >>>which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea >>>- a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been >>>targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build >>>nuclear weapons. >>>The whole 2003 article from the UK Guardian is here >>>www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html. >>>Today, journalists in the White House daily press briefing were subjected >>>to a tirade from Press Secretary Tony Snow about how Bill Clinton created >>>the mess in with the DPRK. >>>Unfortunately, Don Rumsfeld’s willingness to sell anything for a buck >>>before he came to government to fight the axis of evil that he helped >>>create (and profited handily from) went unmentioned. >>>Shades of Saddam Hussein and Iraq. I guess you could say, Rummy voted for >>>the axis of evil, before he voted against it.
Response:
> > That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK > now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad > stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid > else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can > be decades old. > "Capiche" this bitch writes. Earlier, he was leg-humping England. > RumsFELD is an old hack dating back to Nixon. Clock’s tickin, chicken.
And what kind of homo-phobic stance is that? Pretend you ar part of the left and BAM – you start bashing gays, Catholics, and Irish people.
Response:
This assitch couldn’t WAIT to introduce a non-sequitur to the truth regarding the entire failure in D.C. FauxNews must be "Lookin’ out for him". "The spin stops" -after the sky goes glug-glug in neoconville.
. mvm – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Why are you so homo-phobic???? Gays have rights, too, but that’s always > been the way of the left – pretend you are for somebody and as soon as > push comes to shove, you back off. Didn’t you libs learn anything from > Brokeback Mountain? > In the future, please don’t hide your gay-bashing behind a faux attack > on Rumsfeld!
Response:
Oh, I must be "Left" if I’m anti-neocon
The Gay thing…on your mind quite a bit there fella? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->McNamara aint Greek or Roman
> More gay-bashing from the left as usual. >>>That was then; this is now. >>Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I >>don’t think so. >>The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary >>of defense in recent memory…
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >>now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >>stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >>else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >>be decades old. >"Capiche" this bitch writes. Earlier, he was leg-humping England. >RumsFELD is an old hack dating back to Nixon. Clock’s tickin, chicken. > And what kind of homo-phobic stance is that? Pretend you ar part of the > left and BAM – you start bashing gays, Catholics, and Irish people.
Whoah- this one’s about ready yo bust OUT
.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >>>now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >>>stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >>>else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >>>be decades old. >>"Capiche" this bitch writes. Earlier, he was leg-humping England. >>RumsFELD is an old hack dating back to Nixon. Clock’s tickin, chicken. > And what kind of homo-phobic stance is that? Pretend you ar part of the > left and BAM – you start bashing gays, Catholics, and Irish people. > Whoah- this one’s about ready yo bust OUT
.
And anti-fat people, too, I see. You must hate everybody.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>That was then; this is now. Is Rumsfeld selling nuclear parts to NK >>>>now? Didn’t think so. So update your info next time. If you have bad >>>>stuff on Repubs, it must be dated within the last 30 days to be valid >>>>else it doesn’t exist. Capiche? Just to be fair, bad stuff on dems can >>>>be decades old. >>>"Capiche" this bitch writes. Earlier, he was leg-humping England. >>>RumsFELD is an old hack dating back to Nixon. Clock’s tickin, chicken. >>And what kind of homo-phobic stance is that? Pretend you ar part of the >>left and BAM – you start bashing gays, Catholics, and Irish people. >Whoah- this one’s about ready yo bust OUT
. > And anti-fat people, too, I see. You must hate everybody.
I wasn’t referring to busting out of your dress, -but if that’ll give some fast temporary Summer relief, get too it, Hulka
Response:
Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for not believing what God has written. Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. Romans 1:22-27 V22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, V23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. V24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: V25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever. Amen. V26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: V27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. 1 Timothy 1:8-10 V8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; V9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, V10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; 1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Oh, I must be "Left" if I’m anti-neocon
> The Gay thing…on your mind quite a bit there fella? >>McNamara aint Greek or Roman
> More gay-bashing from the left as usual. >>>>That was then; this is now. >>>Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I >>>don’t think so. >>>The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary >>>of defense in recent memory…
Response:
> Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s > Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for > not believing what God has written.
As you can see, we have our own mullahs and jihadii over here. __ Steve .
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s >Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for >not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > .
Except, of course, they aren’t executing non-Christians.
Response:
Indeed. Is the death penalty for working on Sunday (Exodus 35:2) and for shaving and having a haircut (Leviticus 19:27)? I forget…. — Phil Wilson
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s > Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for > not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > .
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s >>Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for >>not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > . > Except, of course, they aren’t executing non-Christians.
Hell, give ‘em credit… they’re getting plenty of Muslims, too… many more than Christians, I believe… ain’t that right? __ Steve .
Response:
sheeplidiot. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s > Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for > not believing what God has written. > Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it > is abomination. > Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a > woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be > put to death; their blood shall be upon them. > Romans 1:22-27 > V22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, V23 And > changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to > corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping > things. > V24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of > their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: > V25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served > the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever. Amen. > V26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even > their women did change the natural use into that which is against > nature: > V27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, > burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that > which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their > error which was meet. > 1 Timothy 1:8-10 > V8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; > V9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for > the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for > unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, > for manslayers, > V10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for > menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other > thing that is contrary to sound doctrine; > 1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit > the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor > idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves > with mankind > SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal > hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away > my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my > heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life. >Oh, I must be "Left" if I’m anti-neocon
>The Gay thing…on your mind quite a bit there fella? >>>McNamara aint Greek or Roman
>>More gay-bashing from the left as usual. >>>>>That was then; this is now. >>>>Duh. Like North Korea was totally different, just a few years ago? I >>>>don’t think so. >>>>The real question is why you are defending the most incompetent sectretary >>>>of defense in recent memory…
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s >Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for >not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > .
A+
Response:
> > Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s > Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for > not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > .
what I’ve been trying to warn you all about. These Dominionist cats are more dangerous than Hitler and Stalin wrapped around an ayatollah burrito style. What part of levitican law don’t you understand? I love they way they pick and choose their scripture. Never mind that Jesus said the old law was out and in with the new law. Why is it they want the 10 commandments in the court house but not the golden rule or any of the other "compassionate" rules of the new law, turning the other cheeks, etc? Cause it don’t give them no pocket is cause why.
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s >>Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for >>not believing what God has written. > As you can see, we have our own mullahs > and jihadii over here. > __ > Steve > . > Except, of course, they aren’t executing non-Christians.
not yet, but they would if they cound and now they are getting virtual practise http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/5/29/195855/959 Imagine: you are a foot soldier in a paramilitary group whose purpose is to remake America as a Christian theocracy, and establish its worldly vision of the dominion of Christ over all aspects of life. You are issued high-tech military weaponry, and instructed to engage the infidel on the streets of New York City. You are on a mission – both a religious mission and a military mission — to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state – especially moderate, mainstream Christians. Your mission is "to conduct physical and spiritual warfare"; all who resist must be taken out with extreme prejudice. You have never felt so powerful, so driven by a purpose: you are 13 years old. You are playing a real-time strategy video game whose creators are linked to the empire of mega-church pastor Rick Warren, best selling author of The Purpose Driven Life. The game, slated for release by October 2006 in advance of the Christmas shopping rush, has been previewed at video game exhibitions, and reviewed by major newspapers and magazines. But until now, no fan or critic has pointed out the controversial game’s connection to Mr. Warren or his dominionist agenda. You all need to take this seriously cause they are, and they really are here and not in North Korea.
Response:
Ignore it, it’s just part of his schtick, you know like Ann Coulter really is a Deadhead and Howard Stern is really a daddy.
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> >>Brokeback? Whatever you think, you will not be able to change God’s >> >>Word regarding homosexuality and will one day have to pay the price for >> >>not believing what God has written. >> > As you can see, we have our own mullahs >> > and jihadii over here. >> > __ >> > Steve >> > . >> Except, of course, they aren’t executing non-Christians. >not yet, but they would if they cound and now they are getting virtual >practise >And mullah Pat Robertson has already called for assisinations… not to >mention our own Claudette.
You’re already assissyfied, Al. When are you going over to the mideast to be a subhumanoid shield?
Response:
courageously avow: > McNamara aint Greek or Roman
>More gay-bashing from the left as usual.
This is gay bashing how? You haven’t been into TipD’s MVM paranoia pills have you. — Ken Wilson