Send As SMS

2/21/2006

PMOSE

Here's an argument for tax credits for education, or something.
From a quiz I gave last week:

Question: How would Rav react if a Mishna contradicted what he felt the halacha to be?
Answer I wanted (as quoted from the article linked above):
“Rav Tanna Hu U-Polig,” Rav is considered as a Tanna and consequently has the right to dispute with a Tanna.” Rav was a transitional figure, between the Period of the Tannaim (Scholars of the Mishnah) and the later Period of the Amoraim (Scholars of the Gemara).
Answer I got: He would get angry and assasinate the person who ruled that way (targeted assasination).

4 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Have you considered getting that kid some serious help?

10:43 AM  
Steven I. Weiss said...

Truth be told, it's not as though the answer you were hoping for is really a response to the question you wrote.
Also, maybe he means assasinate as it's used in our favorite story from Tractate Megillah.

2:02 PM  
Karban Nesanel said...

i love the pmose!

4:24 PM  
LMOM said...

I -- you're right, my bad. I was hoping he would respond by pointing out that Rav was certainly well-versed (from his time spent studying in Israel with later Tannaim) in the art of simply disagreeing with a Mishna, an option generally not available to his Babylonian counterparts.

anon -- we were just having an Israel Discussion, so that's apparently what stuck. No cause for alarm; just a (successful) attempt at humor.

6:45 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home